220118 Boundary Adjustment Committee AgendaPage 1 of 2
The Corporation of the Town of Tillsonburg
Boundary Adjustment Advisory Committee
January 18, 20222
7:30 a.m. Electronic
AGENDA
1.Call to Order
2.Adoption of Agenda
Proposed Resolution #1
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Agenda as prepared for the Boundary Adjustment Advisory Committee
meeting of January 18, 2022, be adopted.
3.Minutes of the Previous Meeting
Proposed Resolution #2
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Minutes as prepared for the Boundary Adjustment Advisory Committee
meeting on November 16, 2021, be adopted.
4.Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest and the General Nature Thereof
5.Presentations
$77$&+('
Presentation from Eric Gilbert on the Tillsonburg Residential Land Supply
Update Briefing Note
5.5.11
(ATTACHED)
55.2.2
Presentation from Eric Gilbert on the Settlement Expansion Process
Briefing Memo
(ATTACHED)(2)
Page 2 of 2
February 15, 2022 at 7:30 a.m.
10.Adjournment
Proposed Resolution #3
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the January 18, 2022 Boundary Adjustment Advisory Committee meeting
be adjourned at _____ a.m.
8.Round Table
9.Next Meeting
Closed Session
Proposed Resolution #3
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Boundary Adjustment Advisory Committee move into closed session to
discuss a proptery owners request.
7 7 .
General Business and Reports6.
Page 1 of 3
The Corporation of the Town of Tillsonburg
Boundary Adjustment Advisory Committee
November 16, 2021
7:30 a.m.
Electronic
MINUTES
Present: Andrew Burns, Dave Beres (Chair), Cedric Tomico, Jesse Goossens,
Samantha Hamilton
Staff present:
Kyle Pratt, CAO
Kennedy Atkinson, Acting Executive Assistant
Cephas Panschow, Development Commissioner
Eric Gilbert, Senior Planner for Oxford County
1.Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 7:32 a.m.
2.Adoption of Agenda
Resolution #1
Moved by: Cedric Tomico
Seconded by: Jesse Goossens
THAT the Agenda as prepared for the Boundary Adjustment Advisory Committee
meeting of November 16, 2021, be adopted.
Carried
3.Minutes of the Previous Meeting
Resolution #2
Page 2 of 3
Moved by: Cedric Tomico
Seconded by: Jesse Goossens
THAT the Minutes as prepared for the Boundary Adjustment Advisory Committee
meeting of October 19th, 2021, be adopted.
Carried
4.Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest and the General Nature Thereof
There were no disclosures of pecuniary interest declared.
Resolution #3
Moved by: Cedric Tomico
Seconded by: Samantha Hamilton
THAT the committee move into closed session at 7:37 a.m. to consider a proposed
or pending Acquisition or disposition of land by the municipality or local board.
Carried
5. Presentations
5.1 Eric Gilbert, Senior Planner, Oxford County Re: Oxford Planning Briefing
Memo dealt with in Closed Session.
6. Round Table
The Committee resumed open session at 8:11 a.m.
6.Next Meeting
December 21, 2021 at 7:30 a.m. – This meeting has been rescheduled to January
18th 2021.
It is requested that Eric Gilbert’s team provide information on Industrial land
expansion.
7.Adjournment
Resolution #4
Moved by: Jesse Goossens
Seconded by: Andrew Burns
Page 3 of 3
THAT the November 16, 2021 Boundary Adjustment Advisory Committee meeting
be adjourned at 8:15 a.m.
Carried
STAFF BRIEFING NOTE
COMMUNITY PLANNING OFFICE
Overview of Process and Land Use Planning Considerations
Related to Municipal Boundary Adjustments for Settlement
Expansion Purposes
October, 2021
Background/Purpose
The purpose of this memo is to provide a brief overview of the land use planning process and
related considerations associated with a municipal boundary adjustment for the purposes of an
urban settlement expansion (e.g. for development purposes) in the County of Oxford. This memo
does not address the various other issues and considerations that may be part of the boundary
adjustment discussion process, such as impacts on municipal assessment, compensation and
service agreements etc.
Overview of the Settlement Expansion Process
a) Municipal Act Framework
Locally initiated municipal boundary adjustments are subject to the relevant provisions of Part V
of the Municipal Act, 2001 that address a negotiated settlement between municipalities and the
approval of the annexation by the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing.
There is no Provincial requirement to justify the proposed location, configuration and/or extent of
the lands to be incorporated into the corporate boundary of an urban municipality as part of the
boundary adjustment process under the Municipal Act. However, such matters are still essential
to consider if the annexed lands are intended for settlement expansion purposes, as the permitted
use of such lands is determined by their Official Plan designation and zoning, not by the location
of the corporate boundary. Development of any annexed lands for non-agricultural (e.g.
settlement) purposes would require an Official Plan amendment to re-designate the lands from
‘agricultural reserve’ to ‘settlement’. Such amendments must be consistent with the policy
requirements of the 2020 Provincial Policy Statement and the County Official Plan, both of which
require justification of need and location for any settlement expansion. These types of Official
Plan amendments tend to be closely monitored by the Province to ensure they have been justified
in accordance with Provincial policy.
Therefore, if the intent of a municipal boundary adjustment/annexation is to incorporate lands for
settlement expansion/development purposes, planning staff generally advise that the relevant
land use planning considerations be considered (at least preliminarily) as part of the boundary
adjustment process. This will help to ensure that municipalities involved in the boundary
adjustment process have a general understanding of whether the location and extent of any lands
to be annexed can be reasonably justified for re-designation to ‘settlement’, before the boundary
adjustment is finalized. Planning staff are available to assist in this regard by providing planning
related information and advice, including the preparation of preliminary land use screening
mapping for any proposed annexation areas, where requested.
b) Land Use Planning Considerations - Provincial Policy
The Planning Act requires that all municipal land use planning decisions be ‘consistent with’ the
Provincial Policy Statement (PPS). The current 2020 Provincial Policy Statement contains a
range of policies that apply to proposed settlement expansions including, but not limited to:
i) 25 Year Planning Horizon
Section 1.1.2 of the PPS directs that sufficient land shall be made available to accommodate
an appropriate range and mix of land uses to meet projected land needs for a time horizon
of up to 25 years. The projected growth is to be accommodated through intensification and
re-development and, if necessary, designated growth areas.
However, the PPS does not limit planning for infrastructure and public service facilities or
long term protection of employment areas beyond a 25 year planning horizon, provided that
no lands are designated for growth beyond the 25 year planning horizon. Further, the PPS
does not prevent municipalities from undertaking planning (e.g. secondary planning and
servicing strategies) for a longer time frame or larger area, provided that no lands are
designated for growth beyond the 25 year planning horizon.
Given the considerable lead time often required to complete municipal boundary adjustments
and the secondary planning required to expand a settlement area designation and to provide
the level of certainty necessary to undertake the comprehensive, longer term planning
required to ensure the development of complete communities and associated infrastructure
and public services, municipalities may wish to consider looking beyond the 25 year planning
period for the purposes of adjusting their corporate boundaries. The designation of any
additional growth lands in accordance with such longer term plan could then be phased-in
(e.g. through Official Plan amendment) as required to ensure a consistent 25 year supply of
land is maintained.
ii) Coordination
Section 1.2 of the PPS indicates that the Upper Tier Municipality (in consultation with Area
Municipalities) is responsible for matters such as:
Identifying and allocating population, housing and employment projections to the
Area Municipalities;
Identifying where growth or development will be directed;
Identifying targets for intensification and redevelopment; and
Providing policy direction to the Area Municipalities on matters that cross municipal
boundaries.
In Oxford, this PPS requirement is largely addressed through Official Plan policy and the
County Growth Forecasts and Land Needs Study (e.g. Phase 1 Comprehensive Review,
2020), which is updated in consultation with the Area Municipalities approximately every 5
years.
iii) Providing for Appropriate Range and Mix of Housing
Section 1.4.1 of the PPS requires that planning authorities maintain at all times the ability to
accommodate projected residential growth for a minimum of 15 years through residential
intensification and redevelopment and, if necessary, lands which are designated and
available for development. Further, a minimum 3 year supply of residential units in draft
approved or registered plans and/or on lands suitably zoned to facilitate residential
intensification is to be maintained together with adequate servicing capacity.
iv) Settlement Expansions
Section 1.1.3.8 and of the PPS indicates that the designation of lands for settlement purposes
can only occur through a ‘comprehensive review’. A comprehensive review is defined by the
PPS as an Official Plan review initiated or adopted by a planning authority, which is based on
a review of population and employment projections and reflects allocations by an upper tier
municipality and which demonstrates that:
Physical constraints to accommodating growth within the existing settlement boundary
have been considered and that sufficient opportunities for growth are not available
through intensification, redevelopment and existing designated growth areas to
accommodate projected needs over the 25 year planning horizon;
Infrastructure and public services which are planned or available are suitable for the
development and financially viable over their life cycle and that planning for
infrastructure and public services is integrated with planning for growth;
Alternative directions for growth or development have been evaluated and it has been
determined how best to accommodate growth while protecting provincial interests.
For example, impact on natural resources (e.g. woodlands, wetlands, water,
agriculture land/operations, minerals and petroleum, cultural heritage and
archeological resources) and protecting public health and safety by avoiding natural
and/or human made hazards);
There are no reasonable alternatives that avoid prime agricultural lands or are on
lower priority agricultural lands, the proposed expansion complies with the minimum
distance separation formula, and impacts on agricultural operations which are
adjacent or close to the settlement area are mitigated to the extent feasible; and
Cross jurisdictional issues have been considered.
The recently completed County of Oxford Phase 1 Comprehensive Review study (Hemson, March
2020) provides the current basis for addressing the PPS comprehensive review requirements
related to population and employment forecasts and allocations and associated land need.
Further, the estimated land need for each Area Municipality is generally updated by the County
planning office on an annual basis.
With respect to the comprehensive review requirements related to the evaluation of alternative
directions for growth, following is an overview of some of the key land use planning considerations
that must typically be reviewed and addressed in Oxford:
Prime Agricultural Lands – Virtually all lands located outside of designated settlements in
Oxford are considered to be prime agricultural land. Therefore, assessment of agricultural
impacts is typically a key consideration when evaluating the most appropriate direction for
any proposed settlement expansion. Such an assessment typically involves, but is not
necessarily limited to, consideration of soil capability, size of parcels, degree of land
fragmentation, prevalence of existing non-agricultural uses, size and type of livestock
facilities, level of investment in farm infrastructure, and impacts on the broader agricultural
system (e.g. support services, agricultural related industries etc.).
Minimum Distance Separation Formulae (MDS) – MDS is a land use planning tool that
determines a recommended separation distance between a livestock barn and/or manure
storage facility and a potentially sensitive land use (i.e. a settlement area or other non-
agricultural use). The objective is to prevent land use conflicts and minimize nuisance
complaints related to odour. Given the size and number of livestock operations in the
County, most settlement expansion proposals tend to be impacted, at least to some
extent, by the presence of existing livestock operations/facilities. The required MDS
setbacks from such facilities may limit the use of lands for settlement expansion purposes
in certain locations.
The application of MDS is optional for a livestock operations are located within a
designated settlement area in an Official Plan. In Oxford, MDS is not typically applied to
livestock operations that have been incorporated into a designated settlement area
through settlement expansion. However, it is important to note that the setback
requirements from livestock operations located outside of a proposed settlement
expansion area can often significantly limit which lands within a proposed expansion area
can be designated for settlement purposes (e.g. as settlement expansions are required to
comply with MDS). These potential MDS impacts can result from livestock facilities
located as far as 1.5 km beyond the limits of a proposed settlement.
Limestone and Sand and Gravel Resources – The PPS states that, in areas adjacent to
or within known deposits of mineral aggregate resources, development and activities
which would preclude or hinder new aggregate operations or access to the resource (e.g.
settlement expansions) shall only be permitted if the resource extraction would not be
feasible, the proposed land use serves a greater long-term public interest and if issues of
public health, public safety and environmental impact are addressed. For this reason, it
is typically difficult to justify including lands containing such resources in a proposed
settlement expansion area.
Natural Features and Areas – Open watercourses are generally considered to be potential
fish habitat and any associated valleyland/floodplain areas are identified as both
significant environmental features and natural hazard areas. Most wetlands and larger
wooded areas are also considered to be significant natural heritage features.
Development and site alteration are not generally permitted within such features and any
proposed development on any adjacent lands is generally required to undertake an
environmental impact study to demonstrate that there will be no negative impact on such
features or their ecological functions. As such, although lands occupied by and
immediately adjacent to such features are often located within proposed areas of
settlement expansion, they are not generally included in the determination of the
developable land area.
Natural and Man-Made Hazards – Development is not generally permitted on lands
subject to natural (e.g. flooding, erosion, unstable soils etc.) and/or man-made (e.g.
contaminated sites, oils and gas wells etc.) hazards. As such, although such lands are
often located within proposed areas of settlement expansion, they are generally not
included in the determination of the developable land area.
Wellhead Protection Areas – Lands located within a Wellhead Protection Areas may be
subject to certain restrictions on uses/activities. For instance, certain activities prescribed
under the Clean Water Act are considered to be significant drinking water threats in these
areas and, as such, may be prohibited, restricted or otherwise regulated by the policies in
an approved Source Protection Plan. Although the vast majority of activities can only be
a significant threat within a WHPA-A (e.g. 100 m around the well), Dense Non-Aqueous
Phase Liquids (DNAPLS), which may be used in certain industrial type
processes/operations, can be significant threats in WHPAs A to C. As such, the WHPAs
may be a consideration in determining the most appropriate location for future employment
lands.
Efficient Use of Infrastructure and Public Service Facilities – The PPS requires that any
infrastructure (roads, transit, water and wastewater, storm drainage, utilities etc.) and
public service facilities (e.g. libraries, emergency services, recreation facilities etc.) are
suitable for the proposed development and financially viable over their life cycle.
Provincial Highway crossings, environmental features, topography, location and capacity
of existing services, and type, extent and timing of development are just some of the
considerations that may affect the cost and/or feasibility of servicing a potential annexation
area. These considerations are typically addressed, at least at a functional level, through
the Servicing Strategy that is part of the Comprehensive Review/Secondary Planning
exercise required to consider any proposed settlement expansion. However, in the case
of infrastructure, any Environmental Assessment requirements will also need to be
considered. Any specific questions with respect to planning for Water and Wastewater
Servicing infrastructure should be directed to County Public Works.
c) Official Plan Policies and Zoning
The lands located outside of existing settlement areas in the County are designated primarily as
‘Agricultural Reserve’ in the County Official Plan. Therefore, if any such lands were to be
annexed, an Official Plan Amendment would be required to change the land use designation from
‘Agricultural Reserve’ to ‘Settlement’, before any of the lands could be used for settlement
purposes. Such an amendment would need to be consistent with the relevant policies of the PPS
and Official Plan.
The Official Plan policies require the municipality to undertake a secondary planning study and a
servicing strategy prior to the re-designation of any annexed lands for settlement purposes. The
primary purpose of these studies is to justify the extent and location/direction of the proposed
settlement expansion and to identify appropriate land use designations, urban design standards,
major road alignments, public service and infrastructure locations and requirements, pedestrian
and transit routes, development phasing, how natural resources (e.g. environmental features and
aggregates) are to be protected and environmental hazards avoided etc.
If more than one area is being proposed for annexation, it is possible that each area could be
studied separately, particularly if they are intended for different purposes (e.g. employment vs.
residential). Normally, the County and Area Municipality would oversee the preparation of such
studies, with qualified consultants retained to assist staff in addressing the complex technical
issues. The studies would result in recommendations for appropriate land use designations, and
provide directions on which servicing approaches best suit the potential future development of
the annexed lands. Following completion of the secondary planning and servicing studies, an
amendment to the Official Plan would generally be initiated by the Area Municipality/County to
implement the findings and recommendations of the studies. However, in some circumstances
(e.g. where the lands are in one ownership and intended primarily for residential development or
a single use) the County and Area Municipality may potentially allow a development proponent to
prepare and submit the required studies and planning applications for Council’s review and
approval.
In Oxford, the majority of the land surrounding most existing settlements is zoned for agricultural
purposes. Therefore, following the adoption of any Official Plan amendment to establish policies
and land use designations for any settlement expansion on such lands, the Area Municipality
within which they are contained would need to adopt zoning to accommodate and regulate the
intended type and forms of urban development. Post-annexation, two (2) approaches are
commonly used to establish new zoning:
i) In annexed areas that have not been re-designated for settlement purposes (e.g. remain
designated for agriculture), or that are within a settlement designation for which new
comprehensive zoning has not yet been established, lands may be rezoned on a site-
specific or case-by-case basis in accordance with the applicable Official Plan
designation; or,
ii) In the case of annexed lands that have been re-designated for settlement purposes, the
Area Municipality can pre-zone all of or parts of such lands in anticipation of intended
growth.
It should be noted that the Zoning By-law provisions of the Area Municipality from which the lands
were annexed will generally continue to apply until such time as the municipality that annexed the
lands has amended their comprehensive zoning by-law to incorporate said lands.
Questions?
As a starting point, any questions regarding the information contained in this memo should be
directed to the County planner assigned to the Area Municipality(ies) involved and they can then
consult with and/or involve other County staff (i.e. PW, policy planners, GIS etc.) as may be
necessary to respond.
1 / 2
BRIEFING NOTE
Tillsonburg Residential Land Supply Update
Updated November 12, 2021
Overview
The following information is provided in response to the Town’s recent request for updated growth
related information. This information is based on some quick updates to the Town’s land inventory
estimates and some growth sensitivity analysis (i.e. based on recent building permit trends) undertaken
by planning staff. Hopefully, it will assist with some general discussion of the Town’s potential longer
term growth land needs, but should by no means be considered a formal land needs update.
Just to be clear, the forecasted growth contained in the Oxford Population, Household and Employment
Forecasts and Land Needs study, Hemson 2020 remains the approved growth forecast basis for
planning purposes until such time as that study is formally updated (Note: the next planned update to
the growth forecasts is currently intended to be initiated in 2023, once all the required data from the
2021 Census has been released). However, the land supply information in the Hemson study is
updated by CPO staff on an annual basis (i.e. based on year end building permit data and development
approvals), so that information is kept as current as possible.
Residential Growth
The forecasted residential growth in the Hemson, 2020 study for the current 25 year planning period
(2021 to 2046) is 1,990 residential units.
In comparison, a quick review of the Town’s building permit data for the 3 year period (2018-2021)
indicates that the number of dwelling starts during that period appears to have been considerably higher
(i.e. roughly double) the forecasted annual housing growth rate over that period. Although the number
of single/semi-detached units was somewhat higher than forecasted, the variation appears to have been
primarily driven by a much higher than expected number of townhouse and apartment units being
constructed over that period. Based on 3rd quarter building permit data, it appears this trend is
continuing into 2021. It is noted that this trend is similar to what is being experienced in a number of
the Area Municipalities in the County, however, it currently appears to have been most pronounced in
Tillsonburg.
Residential Land Supply
Based on the actual lot/unit counts for vacant lots in known developments (i.e. submitted, draft approved
and registered plans of subdivision, site plans), together with the estimated number of units that could
be accommodated on the remaining designated residential lands not yet under development (i.e. based
on an average blended density of 22 units per net ha, as per Hemson, 2020), it is estimated that Town’s
remaining land supply could currently accommodate approximately 3,235 residential units (note: this is
actually up from the estimated 3,112 units of supply in the Hemson study due to the increase in density
and gross to net factors).
It is important to understand that the 22 units/ha density assumption in Hemson was based on a much
lower ratio of the total residential growth being comprised of townhouses and apartment units (e.g.
2 / 2
30%) With the Town’s recent trend toward higher density housing types (i.e. townhouses and
apartments), even recent low density residential developments have been closer to 30 units per ha, and
that is not even accounting for the development densities of medium and high density residential (i.e.
apartments). Therefore, the current average blended density for the Town is likely now considerably
higher than the 22 units/ha assumed in the Hemson study (i.e. in excess of 30 units per ha).
So, if recent trend in increased building permits for residential units were to be taken into consideration
as part of any growth land need update, the average development density assumption would also need
to be updated to account for the trend toward higher density units. That would mean the Town’s
estimated unit yield for the same developable land area would increase accordingly (i.e. as more units
could be expected to be accommodated per ha). For instance, if a fairly conservative blended
residential density (i.e. accounting for LD, MD and HD development) assumption of 30 units/ha were
now to be used for the purposes of estimating unit yield (i.e. in place of the current 22 units/ha) for lands
that are not yet subject to development, it is estimated that the Town’s remaining residential land supply
could accommodate approximately 3,750 additional dwelling units.
To compare this to demand, even if the Town’s residential growth were to be double the current
forecasted growth for the 25 year planning period (i.e. 3,800 units vs. 1,900 units), it would appear that
the Town’s current land supply could still accommodate almost all of that growth.
That said, planning staff will continue to monitor the Town’s supply and growth trends in preparation for
the next formal update to the growth forecasts in 2023.
Prepared by: Paul Michiels, Manager of Planning Policy
Circulated to: Town of Tillsonburg Boundary Adjustment Committee
25.6 ha12.7 ha11.2 ha
8.7 ha
7.6 ha
28.2 ha
7.9 ha
5.3 ha
2.7 ha
4.4 ha
2.7 ha
1.3ha
0.92 ha
0.59 ha
COVEREDPORTICOGGGGGGSITE PLANSCALE 1:500SOUTH RIDGE PUBLIC SCHOOLSOUTH RIDGE ROADTULIP DRIVETRILLIUM DRIVEQUARTER TOWN LINE
SIMPLY 360CONDOMINIUMSEXISTINGCONDOMINIUMSLANGRELLAVENUESOUTHRIDGE PARKEXISTING RESIDENTIALEXISTING RESIDENTIALEXISTING RESIDENTIALEXISTING RESIDENTIALEXISTING RESIDENTIALEXISTING RESIDENTIALEXISTING RESIDENTIALNORTH LEGSOUTH LEGWEST LEG
EAST LEG EASTENTRANCE1LIST OF DRAWINGSDESCRIPTIONDWG1.2.360 WEST LANDSPART X, XXR-XXXX2563557 ONTARIO INC.361 QUARTER TOWN LINETOWN OF TILLSONBURG6.7.4.5.3.8.9.10.11.
~
------------
MUN#164188 ~
MUN#3
MUN#i 12
T CORNER OF'
C£SSJON, 11
1
4-5. a
li 2
I ~ 1'----,1-;;3e:72=s-~--11
~ ~ 10
~~Jl~.-.l--~--,,37'.62~7-1-1-+-;
1-z w
(.)
Vl w a;
()
a
~
Cl
0
0
5
MUN#J06
\ ~\ \89
3 Oo""o+---i
OPEN SPACE
MuNR104 MUN#100
P.lN.
74
:;
78 ::l -
MUN#98 M0N#94
I RESIDENTIAL
QQ019
0
---------
MUN#92 MUNf90 MUN#68
62
1 .. 911 .15. t1
--------~----
------
RESIDENTIAL
.MiJN#80
31
29
28
27
MUN#72 MUN#70 MUN#68
RESIDENTIAL
32
34
35
36
BLOCK 202
· 0_:922Ha
fr_/i~·
MUN#66
!
44
32.736
MUNl64
'"' 0 ~1
9\ o:> .
MUN#60
MUNH2 MUN#4 MUN!f6
PARK PL
MUN#1 MUN#3 MUN#5
INTUITIONAL
MUNif280
1-------·-----
-----·----c----t
-----1--
RESIDENTltL .
MUN#2
' L~--
S\!t1Jelll10 ltllll coodillona. if 11.11'1• -~In
our leltef dated !lb~ 2 "' · _,
20 ;t,1 , this draft pl~ pprollfld under
section 51 ol tl'le Planning AP· B s.o. lil!!l.
as. amended, th~ £-1-1. GFl!J 0(1
ffirnw)t -.20
'~ Director .
Community Planmng
county of Oxford
MUN#4
WOODLAND CRESCENT.
~ WOODSIDE DRIVE
" ~ JAMES AVENUE ~t--:'~~M~ES~A"'11~U~E-,-~L,_-t"°-~t w 8 ~ ~
g ~~ ~
NORTI-1 STREET WEST .(COUNiY ROAD 20) "<
No
1
2
KEY PLAN
DRAFT PLAN OF
SUBDIVISION
PART OF LOT 8
CONCESSION 11
ALL OF PIN 00025-0875
GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF DEREHAM
MUNICIPAL/TY OF THE
TOWN OF TILLSONBURG
COUNTY OF OXFORD
OWNER'S AUTHORIZATION
WE HERESY SUBMIT THIS DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION
WE HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO BIND THE CORPORATION,
SOUTHSIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT LIMITED
NTS
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND TD BE SUBDIVIDED, AS
SHOWN DN THIS PLAN, AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO THE ADJACENT LANDS ARE
ACCURATELY AND CORRECTLY SHOWN.
KlM~4~ ..
KIM HUSTED SURVEYING LTD.
REQUIREMENTS UNDER SECTION
51 ( 17) OF THE PLANNING ACT
A: /lS SHOWN ON PLAN
8: AS SHOWN ON PLAN
C: /lS SHOWN ON KEY PLAN
D: LOW AND MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
E: /lS SHOWN ON PLAN
F: /lS SHOWN ON PLAN
G: />$ SHOWN ON PLAN
H:. MUNICIPAL WATER
I: SAND LOAM
J: AS SHOWN ON PLAN
K: FULL SERVICES w l>S SHOWN ON PLAN
LAND USE SCHEDULE
LAND USE·
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
LOTS 1 THROUGH 103
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
BLOCKS 200 & 201
STORMWATE'.R MANAGEMENT FACILITY
BLOCK 202 & 203
PARKLAND
BLOCKS 204
ROAD WIDENING
BLOCK 205 & 206
G T 0
(STREETS A, B, C & D)
TOTAL AREA
AREA IN.
HECTARES
6.837
2.074
0.827
0.991
0.120
2.595
13.444
%
50.9%
15.4%
6.1%
7.4%
0.9%
19.3%
100.0%
London Office
41 Adelaide St. JN., Unit 71
(519) 672-8310 .
development ~
• •
l'arl&Offlce enQlQ~~!JtlJJ
31 Mechanlp St., Unit 1101
(519) 442-1441 CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS
. REVISIONS DATE
DRAFT PLAN APPLICATION SEPT. 01/20
REVISED MEDIUM DENSITY BLOCK 200 OCT. 28/20
1--t------'
WESTWINDS
SOUTHSIDE CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT LIMITED
PROJECT No.
DEL20-005
SCALE -SHEEf No.
1w~ DP
Pl.Ml f!LE No.
~L-~~;__~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~..;__~~~~~~~~~~~~~-.,._,.-~~~~~~~~~~~-.,.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-'-~~~~..,.-~~~~..._~~~~~~~~--'
J LOT 1
z oo u <(
_J 0
<( er:
l.J..
REGISTERED
PLAN QJ 1062
EXISTING RESID~TI~
I
I
0
!RI -COUNTY
PL.~ZA
11 L1)l1--~ 2
,,
•' ,,
REGIS TE Rl:D
I
•
-
!
I
LOT
I I
Mu n ~<9 I GRASS vEqo
cc.~smucno"
J
zz
00
iii (/)
(/) (/)
LL.I LL.I
(.) (.) zz 00
LL.I (.) (.)
(.)
5
0:::
LL.I
Ul
I-1-o o
_J ...J
1
PLAI~ 1033
SITE
I
KEY PLAN
SCA L E 1: 10,000
LOT
IJcn f56
•
0
~\
GEC GRAPHIC
I MuotOe I I I
.________. :·· ''"
PART 1l
• 41R
PART 2
1766
I
5
I I......_"'·· •. ----\
I~-~
-
EJ l·STINGl_RESIDE TIAL
~1 NSHI L::_JJ
~
P·JSOIB LE
FlJ IU~C
'°'
·---..
·'
CONCESSION
OF
°' i "' '
10
DER EH AM
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
-iv m PAR'~,, 41R -5045
::T:_--r · ---~,,-;m-:::: ... ___ ---
... ,
""
f . ----··--··· ----
·"' EXI RESIDENTIAL
.. . .. ---------.------
N 0 R0 T:H s + RE ET 0
••••••••••••••••
0 COU'NTY ROAD 20 0 0 .. / 0 . -
• 1
L2~ 11.91m 4.5"-
15.0"-
/ f---+---rl:.t"''
~ ,,
--J ·~--
DRAFT PLAN
SUBDIVISION
OF
ALL OF
LOT 72A
PART OF
LOT 72
JUDGE'S PLAN REGISTERED
PLAN No. 500
TOWN OF TILLSONBURG
COUNTY OF OXFORD
SCALE 1: 750
0 10 25 50 METRE 100
NOTE: OR IGINAL CONTOURS SHOWN FROM 20XX CJDL SURVEY
AS
• N 78 ' 35' 15" E •
·--.. , _______ _
\ "-"'•
AREA SUMMARY
OESCRIPTION
AREA
(ha)
LOTS 1-7,12,13,16-16,22-43,48, I SINGLE DETACHED RESIDENTIAL 3.99 52-71,70-77,66-96 1 (76 LOTS)
LOTS 6,9,10,11,14,15, 19-21, I TOWNHOME RESIDENTIAL 2 .24 44-47,49,50,69, 78, 79,80,87 (40 LOTS)
DEDICATED STREETS STREET 1A1, 'B'. 'c', ·o· 2.69
BLOCK 99 I FUlURE RESIDENTIAL 0.06
' BLOCKS 100, 101 PARK 0.28
BLOCK 102 SWM 0.43
' BLOCKS 103-105 ROAD WIDENING 0 .13
!
BLOCKS 106-108
'
RESERVES 0 .01
I
TOTAL I 9.83 I
I
----------__ , ___ " ---------------• . -----.... -----
,_~"="~•+--tl:-22m
" 70~ 71 /
18 . .53m
' ---.
:
,'
72
14.Jlm
0 ---------244.5. __
/
"' c.n
INFORMATION REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 51(17) OF THE PLANNING ACT RSO 1990
(A) ON PLAN
(B) ON PLAN
(C) ON PLAN
(D) LOTS 1-7,12,13,16-18,22-43,48,52-71,70-77,88-98 -SINGLE DETACHE ,D RESIDENTIAL
LOTS 8,9,10,11,14,15, 19-21,44-47,49,50,69,78,79,80,87 -SEMI-DETACHED RESIDENTI AL
DED I CATED STREETS -STREET 'A', STREET 'B', STREET 'C', STREET 'D', /
BLOCK 99 -FUT. RESIDENTIAL
BLOCKS 100, 101 -PARK
BLOCK 102 -SWM
BLOCKS 103-105 -ROAD WIDENING
BLOCKS 106-108 -RESERVES
(E) NORTH -EXIST ING RESIDENTIAL, FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
WEST -SERVICE COMMERCIAL ZONE
EAST -FUTURE DEVELOPMENT, PASSIVE USE OPEN SPACE ZONE
SOUTH -EXISTING RESIDENT IAL, PASSIVE USE OPEN SPACE ZONE
(F) ON PLAN
(G) ON PLAN
(H) TOWN WATER AVAILABLE
(I) SAND
(J) ON PLAN
(K) STORM SEWERS, SANITARY SEWERS, TELEPHONE, GAS, T. V.CABLE
(L) TOWN OF TILLSONBURG OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAWS
DISTANCES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE IN METRES AND CAN BE
CONVERTED TO FEET BY DIVIDING BY 0.3048.
•
".?-1<1
··S.
'-i: ~OCK 108
73
12.82m
((Jl<lfl£:!Qq~
74
IJ' ------
" -QO /f-'.) w
w
er:
OWNER'S CERTIFICATE
•
·· .. -L ,
?.!!Om
--J , .
....,J ----------------------7.00m __ .
--· -·· -----· -----· ..
1-~--------,---1 z
,•' .,,,f 1
41-6192 ( ·--7
(/) ,:;
v <( ~
0 w
a::: ' w
I-
(/) :
:
(.'.) .'
W /
.fr'.
t-:c·"
<D
L..l z . <(
__J
0..
MIKE HUTCHINSON PROPERTIES INC., THE REGISTERED OWNER OF THE LANDS TO BE
SUBDIVIDED, HEREBY AUTHORIZE CYRIL J. DEMEYERE LIMITEQ fT O SUBMIT THIS DRAFT PLAN
OF SUBDIVISION FOR APPROVAL. (2 "\
DATE ~._..f\M I CHAEL RICHARD HUTCH INSON, PRESIDENT
\ \ ~ MIKE HUTCHINSON PROPERTIES INC.
~ p...
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE~\_,
V
I HEREBY CERTIF·Y THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LANDS TO BE SUBDIVIDED AND THE IR
RELATIONSHIP TO TO THE ADJACENT LANDS ARE ACCURATELY AND CORRECTLY SHOWN
ON THIS PLAN.
DATE
CJDL
Consulting Engineers
0626
KIM HUSTED, ONTARIO LAND SURVEYOR
Cyril J. Demeyere Limited
P.O. Box 460, 261 Broadway
Tillsonburg, Ontario . N4G 4H8
Tel: 519-688-1000
866-302-9886
Fax: 519-842-3235
cjdl@cjdleng.com
28 JUNE 2019
"
'
'
~ r-
0
0 z
UI
-I ::u m m
-I
..
T
EJo·
;::o
(Tl
(/)
G'f<NARY -c
STREET
N
r.::i ~
tJ . • '
,._
z
-ct>< i: EJ -m
~ _,
z 3
~-----0 ,
;::o
D -~4'
0 -
(Tl z ·
0
B LOCK 12
P..,.L--i
-..
34. 72m
BLOCK 12~ i
33. 72m
[_j
4/(.-
•
•
0
.... ---~ ... ... _ ..
~-
2 rn
r
w ~
• 0
-'
• N
• w
'
33.00m
t
25 24
I
I
I
I
I
FAPTI 2
I '"·-r-
·155
.----
•
I
1
~
• ~
I
• '
• ~
I
33.00m
23
I
I
I
Zp •
• ~ .
-~L;--J-1 " ~
~
"
FUTURE RESIDENTI A L
s:
)>
N ::O
0 -t 3 -
AJ z
O C/)
::;;: -t
::0 m m
-t
20 19
-.
-'"33.00m
u
~
0
0
3
N 12" 17' o.J"" E c -42.!162
A • 42.832
R • 110.000
90
4-'R
33.00m
18
33.00m °""'
LAND USE SCHED U LE
DESCRIPTION
PHASE 1
Single Family Residential
Townhome Residential
Park I Walkways
Stormwaler Management
3m Road Widening
Rood•
Phase 1 Total
LOTS/BLKS . UNITS
1-2 . 4-17 , 19-41 , 49-50, 54 , 56--59 ,
61-63 , 67, 74-78 , 83-85, 91 -93 , 96 ,
102, 109-116
3 , 18, 42-48 , 51-53 , 55, 60 , 64-66,
68-73 , 79-82, 86-90, 94-95 , 97-101 ,
103-108
117-119, 123
120
12 1-122
lARK STREET, MARTIN STREET ,
KEBA CRESCENT , MALLARD STREET ,
BRAUN AVENUE , CANARY STRE ET
71
202
273
/
FUTURE RESIDEN TIAL
CANARY STREET
20m ROW
89 88 87 86
60
AREA (ha)
3.95
5.27
2.11
1.08
0.03
3.81
1625
·4 ~KEBA CRESCENT
411.?
•
•
•
20m ROW
~'-L·4a ' ' 0
33.00m
§
33.0dm 33.00m
32.00m
.,
cf' "' -"""'
' m
N ~
' m -w m
1 7m
' ~ l,i
p
-~--~o
15 76 ~n 78
' m • '
KEBA CRE ~C~N1 j r---
'
I
I
I
I
I
8 --
,,
" 'L ·a· ----
I
I
I
"
zo I
r:~ ..: I
9
I
20m ROW
8 7 8
22 .33m J
' '
' '
I ,.:;:'~
' ' ' ' . ' .__:
'-w
-
' ,,
INFORMATION REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 51(17) OF THE PLANNING ACT RSO 1990
(A)ON PLAN
(B )ON PLAN
(C)ON PLAN
(D) LOTS 1-2, 4-17 , 19-41, 49-50 , 54 , 56-59 , 61-63 , 67, 74-78 , 83-85, 91-93 , 96, 102, 109-116, SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL,
LOTS 3, 18, 42-48, 51-53, 55, 60, 64-66, 68-73 , 79-82 , 66-90 , 94-95, 97-101 , 103-108,
TOWNHOME RESIDENTIAL
DEDICATED STREETS-LARK STREET, MARTIN STREET, KEBA CRESCENT, MALLARD
STREET, BRAUN AVENUE, CANARY STREET
BLOCKS 117-119,123-PARK, WALKWAY,
BLOCK 120-SWM AREA
BLOCKS 121-122-ROAD WIDENING,
(E) NORTH -FUTURE RESIDENTIAL, FUTURE PARK/ WOODLAND
WEST -EXISTING RESIDENTIAL, PARK
EAST -FUTURE SWM, FUTURE RESIDENTlAL
SOUTH -EXISTING RESIDENTIAL ,
(F) ON PLAN
(G)ON PLAN
(H) TOWN WATER AVAILABLE
(I) SAND
(J) ON PLAN
(K) STORM SEWERS, SANITARY SEWERS, TELEPHONE, GAS , T .V .CABLE
(l) TOWN OF TILLSONBURG OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-lAWS
DISTANCES SHOWN ON TH IS PLAN ARE IN METRES AND CAN BE CONVERTED TO FEET BY
4 f fPNIDING !!)' 0 .3048. 5045
DRAFT PLAN OF
SUBDIVISION
PART OF LOT 5
CONCESSION 10
GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF DEREHAM
TOWN OF TILLSONBURG
COUNTY OF OXFORD
OWNER'S CERTIFICATE
LINDPROP CORP ., THE REGISTERED OWNER OF THE LANDS TO BE SUBDIVIDED, HEREBY AUTHORIZE
CYRIL J . DEMEYERE LIMITED TO SUBMIT THIS DRAFT PLAN OF SUBD IVISION FOR APPROVAL .
2021-07-07
--------------oArE ·----
OWNER'S CERTIFICATE
N Tr 54' 54• E N 79"" 01 ' JS• E DETAIL "A"
;, .,
/' ~'
--EREHAM-a
32.00m
33.82m
MALLARD
AVENUE
20m ROW '
34.84m
.,,
c
~
;::o
(Tl
;::o
(Tl
(/)
0
(Tl z
-l
)>
r
-_,.,,.. _:;;.;__-"! --""'"'"I
_/ -
~0 ------. _,.._
L
'-·
NOT TO SCALE
LOT 5 CONCESSION
• PART 2 4/R -ii 10049
I ~~ 41R -
oz
N 711"35' I ~ E ..... ~v
i
r ~N711"ll'll5"E
rn-13' 4tj ___/' }.11 I
PART 1 I PART 2
41R -1166
I
I
10
5045
154.190
PERFORMANCE COMMUNITIES REALTY INC ., THE REGISTERED OWNER OF THE LANDS TO BE
SUBDIVIDED, HEREBY AUTHORIZE CYRIL J. DEMEYERE LIMITED TO SUBM IT THIS DRAFT PLAN OF
SUBDIVISION FOR APPROVAL .
2021--07-08
DATE
PERFORMANCE COMMUNITIES REALTY INC .
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LANDS TO BE SUBDIVIDED ANO THEIR RELATIONSHIP
TO TO THE ADJACENT LANDS ARE ACCURATELY AND CORRECTL V SHOWN
ON THIS PLAN .
2021-07-08
DATE
GI:. _,PAPHIC' I TOWNSHIP OF DEREHAM
DETAIL "B"
NOT TO SCALE
5 CONCESSION
PART
PART
1 41R
2
~ 17.670 N 7lr 2tf 4tr E _._,,._ ... _,,,._._,_ ... _·w-~11:... I
; I I
GF GRAPH 1C ~OWNSl-llP I
10
"i045
SCALE 1:1000
0 1D 25 SD METRE 1DO
I I
NOTE : ORIGINAL CO NTOURS SHOWN FROM 2021 CJDL SURVEY
~ER HAM CJDL
Consulting EnglnE&rs
21001
ADJAC NT LAND~..__
OWNED BY ~PPLICANT
(LINDPR b .
Cyril J. Demeyere Limited
P.O. Box 460, 26 1 Broadway
Tillsonburg, Ontario. N4G 4H8
Tel: 519-688-1000
866·302 ·9886
Fax: 519-842-3235
cjdl@cjdleng.com
7 JULY 2021
No. 20 KEY PL AN
SCALE 1:10,000
SIT
KEY PLAN
SCALE 1:10,000
'
-
"' 0
~
0 w
~
'::i
::::>
CJ
' •
' ' ,
' J ,
-LL -u ct
z
<( -0
<( z
()
,
' l , ' ' , , , . , , ' ' ' ' ! " ' ' ' . '
j !
' ' ' ' ' , ' ; / ' J ' ' ' , '
./ J
' '
J :,/
.,'I •'*"
' ' I ,
' J
'
Lor
1
,
' ' "
4/R
'• ~ ~
j
l
' ~ 4
" <o -.,
I
Q:
' ' '
' ' ' ' ' i
'
E
EX. RE"S IDENTIAL
LOT
4
E X. RESIDENTIAL
29
22
·-~
OF"
N 119• 11' 1:5" £
PART J 4 ?R -9357
10
4 lR -9357
..
~·
2
E
l'l
1
' ' ' ' ' ' ' -1 ').---:
~--,-,,
~ :
E
" ~
~ l. •
• r
~
• . , ._ r
~ -.
, '
r ' ' . ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' -, '
0
i .. , \
----...... i ', ""I' •
........... '\ E \
0
•
,
' ' ' '
... , '\. .
' ' ' ,--.---'~,,~,:~,,~'~,,......l r:~:i-r~~ I \
-----".. ",..,. I -/ E ----------,
' ' '
PART J
41R -5239
0
41 s2v
z 0 P pr? .
N 7!' t 4'_r,:_'(_
~
'
: a::i :z
: <(
! 0:: ll-~~.J_~~~--.~-j ~
~~--...&..!.c_---==~===-~~~~~~·~~
E
' t-~..-..-t1 I~ i '~ E ~ ~ \
li-~~...-"lii>m.1-~:--~ :
>I ' M E ' ' ' ' • ---1--1" I 1 .... :' I -:
u
I
~
..
•
r
L
~I
•• : ~·1 ' .
33 34
24 26
l;j
i-~~..l<.1-'Jl!::-f-ti--1 ~
m
EX . RESIDENTIAL /__<!
/<t D£R£HAM
.t
I
•
' ~ l ~
~
• • rff
i
•
NORTH STREET EAST-COUNTY RD. 20
a
0
"' 0
~
0 w
~
'::i
::::>
CJ
"' 0 z
:5
0 w
~
'::i
::::>
CJ
<i
>--z w
0 en w
"' >< w
<i
"' z w
0
"' w
"' >< w
DRAFT PLAN OF
SUBDIVISION
PART OF
LOT4
CONCESSION 10
GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF DEREHAM
TOWN OF TILLSONBURG
COUNTY OF OXFORD
INFORMATION REQUIRED UNDE R SECTION S1(17) OF THE PLANNING ACT RSO 1990
(A) ON PLAN
(B ) ON PLA N
(C) ON PLAN
(D) LOTS 1-49 -SINGLE DETACHED RESIDENTIAL,
DEDICATED STREETS -STREET 'A',
BLOCK SO -CO MMERCIAL BLOCK
BLOCK S1 -SWM
BLOCKS S2-SS -ROAD WI DENI NG
(E) NORTH -EXISTING RESIDENTIAL, FUTURE DEVELOPMENT,
WEST -TRAIL, CULTIV ATED LANDS
EAST -EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
SOUTH -EXISTING RESIDENTIAL , COMMERCIAL
(F) ON PL AN
(G ) ON PLAN
(H) TOWN WATER AVAILABLE
(I) SAND
(J) ON PLAN
(K ) STOR M SE WER S, SANI TARY SEWERS, TELEPHONE, GAS , T.V.CABLE
(L) TOWN OF TILLSONBURG OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAWS
DISTANCES SHO WN ON THIS PLAN ARE IN METRE S AND CAN BE
CONVERTED TO FEET BY DIVIDING BY 0.3048.
SCALE 1: 750
0 10 2S so METRE
I I
100
NOTE : ORIGINAL CONTOURS SHOWN FR OM 20XX CJDL SURVEY
AREA SUMMARY
DESCRIPTION
LOTS 1-49 SINGLE DETACHED RESIDENTIAL
(49 LOTS)
DEDICATED STREETS STREET 'A'
BLOCK 50 C0Mt.4ERCIA L BLOCK
BLOCK S1 SWt.4
BLOCKS S2-SS ROAD v.IDENING
TOTAL
OWNER'S CERTIEICAIE
AREA
(ha)
2.93
0.90
0.11
0.44
0.08
4.46
GEO RGE AMBRUS, THE REGISTERED OWNER OF THE LAND S TO BE SUBDIVIDED, HEREBY
AUTHORIZE CYR IL J. DEMEYERE LJMITED TO SUBMIT THIS DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION FOR
APPROVAL
OWNER'S CERTIFICATE
CLARA J AMBRUS, THE REGISTERED OWNER OF THE LA ND S TO BE SUBDIVIDED, HER EBY
AUTHORIZE CYRIL J. DEMEYERE LJ MITED TO SUBMIT TH IS DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION FOR
APPROV AL
::(Lwi,;:. t I i.oz...t
DATE
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
CLARA J AMBRUS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LANDS TO BE SUBDIVIDED AND THE IR
RELA TION SHIP TO TO THE ADJACENT LANDS ARE ACCUR ATELY AND CORRECTLY SHOWN
ON THIS PLAN.
31 MA Y 2021
DATE
CJDL
Consulting Engineers
19083
KI M HU
Cyril J. Demeyere Limited
P.O. Box 460, 261 Broadway
Tlllsonburg , Ontario. N4G 4H8
Tel: 519-688 -1000
866-302-9886
Fax: 519-842-3235
cjd lCP cjdleng.rom
31 MA Y 2021
I
'l c
--1 c
:;:o
rri
AJ
rri
(J)
0
rrl z
-I
J> r--
I ~-,-1 I -I ~./};ZJI_ ... 1 P_R_o_P_o_s_E __ o_s_1D_E_w_A_L_K_L_o_c_A_T_1o_N~
I .·
.I
--
' 1 ! .
.>~ 31 S -(M)
N 78" -~·1\ c.J.(;"
. ' .-,
1 2
i8,23 12.20
:;:,
:L_ ' '!:;, --,,
-1-·") c
,,-, -0
"' ..,-"' ·,'> . ..
" 'f, \{ II
\
I LANO _USE__2" ABL~--r----------r·-·-·····-····-··--·-·····
1~~~~SED DIVISONS I PROPOSED LAND USE I AREA ! DENSITY
' II LOTS 1 TO 53 _.=_-r'.'.'GcE ~-~~'<CU lMELLINC5_0~2,---+_~37-~; (58;-~ueo) i~~ 1.UNl~S~c~:
BLOCKS 1 TO 5 (35 LNJTS) lslREET FROMTJNC '0\VNHOUS£S (RM) D 93 ha-· (2.3~~~~:~~;--1·-~~-22 UMITS/ocrfl
J--8-LO::v~~------t:-Nl-£:1~~-l BLO_-;-_.~_-_--_·-_· ·-O 32 lo (5.4%) I
BLOCK 7 ------.1 WAl.KWAX Q.•J084 ~o ! ---·---t---------1 ----·---l
I 1..38 ho j
;.-~~-~~~~~~~~'--~~~~~~~~~~·-~'---·---........ ~=~--'-~~~~~~-! I' TOTAL AREA 4.98 ha. IL_ ____ . ------------'
'
ROADWAYS ROADWAYS
3
\
" 4 8 .
'
12.20
I\ i
\\ v,
o'.: -z. ,,
)>: -<" ..
-..._ .fll
····· z c
fTl
I
5 -·1'~ 6 g / g:
.,
,:_;_• ·-r ;-·· .,,..
I .
\
\
\
\
I
i
:, ; -.
·7 .. 8
12.20
1\GRICULTURAL
>' -.
i
'
' I
···· .... i.
l
[O 10.~··11 q jg
I
1 2 If 1 ;3 .. ~. 1 4 I ..... ······ ..
I
!2 20 12.'.<0 t2.2'J --1. < .. 12.20 12.:w 12.20
... : /•;
B
:STREET. D
c •'
J \
.. c'
·2_!':·rn "'"'01. i
44
12.64
20rr1 ..
• /
RFSIDENTIAL
m
0
/
42
43
17.-00
: -<,
:::CJ
rn
tr
~
N
0
;Z
17 76
17
18
19
20
3'..50 ---------------··-
22
..
31.50
~ -24
Si.50 .•
J! .50 --------------
.26
1 ·'-----3_:_.so ____ _
27
! --,-31-50 ' 1··.J----··-·---··-·.·-------·-
1· ~ 28 i \il
I
' ~ 2.9
! .... "---'""""'"''"'' ----..11
1 6t
BLOCK 5
BLOCK 6
.fv1 U ~,JICIPAL
BLOCK
0.3231 ho
> .> •
. iJ --n
d
< <. --,,
L:+ r;
l ' -·· z
l'l
i.'
'
@,
i
I
I
I
I
I
!
'i '
j
I
~to ht COl!dlliOll8, If q, Mlt blll lfl
0111 letter dated faj %± .:t ± ,
20 \ fl , lhls draft plan Is approved under --
:S~~:~1~~011~r !~:Cd
A!<l fi "ti ,20.l.iL..
2~:t?
KEY PLAN N.T.S.
DRJl,FT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION
OF PART OF
LOT24
LAND REGISTRAR'S COMPILED PLAN 1653
MUNICIPALITY OF THE
TOWN OF TILLSONBURG
COUNTY OF OXFORD
SURVEYOR'S CERT!flC_ATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE LANDS TO BE SUBOIV10£0 ANO THEIR
RELATIONSHIP TO THE ADJACENT LANDS ARE ACCURATELY AND CORRECTLY
SHOWN.
D.~TED:
l .r
-. L'
CON.!$_ENT
I HEREBY CONSENT TO THE FILING OF THIS PLAN IN DRAFT FORM FOR
APPROVAL
DATED:
,;_:, :~·· ''i >· .'....L-:.L·-'·-· :.... _____ _::,;...:;.;:.:.__· ___________ . __
· .
./ '. :·, .'''.,,
OWNER: _:_.,_:,,:.:_.02~.:.:_ ________________ , _____ _
SECTION 51 ( 17} PLANtjlNG ACT R.S.O. 1990
(o) SHOWN ON DRAWINGS.
(b) SHOWN ON DRAWINGS.
(c) SHOt.VN OM DRAWINGS.
( d) LOTS 1 TO 53 TO BE USED FOR SINGLE DETACHED DWELLINGS
BLOCKS 1 TO 5 TO BE USED FOR STREET FRONTING TOWNHOUSES
BLOCX 6 TO BE USED FOR A PARK
( e) SHOWN ON DRAWINGS '
(f) SHOWN ON DRAWINGS .
(g) SHOWN ON DRAWINGS.
(h) A MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY WILL BE INSTALLED BY THE DEVELOPER
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COUNTY OF OXFORD.
(1) SOIL POROSl"IY -HIGH
(j) SHOWN ON DRAWING.
(k) MUNICIPAL SERVICES INCLUDING WATER SUPPLY, SANITARY SEWERS.
STORM SEWERS. CURB AND GUTTER, PAVED ROADS, STREET LIGHTING AND
SIDEWALKS WILL BE INSTALLED BY THE DEVELOPER IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COUN1Y OF OXFORD.
(I) NO RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS IN EXCESS OF THE EXISTING ZONING AND
BUILDING BY-LAWS ARE PROPOSED.
DA.1"!! R~Vl$i0t.1 . -"~------·---~··---
SUBDIVISUlN
DRAFT PLAN
-
TOWN OF TllLLSONBURG
OAAWN ev: DES~GNEE} JSV: CHl'!CKi!il SY: SCALE
DCB JilV MJ .. 1;750
DATE
G. DOUGLAS VALLEE LIMITED l\IOV 14, 2017 2 TALBOT STREET NORTH
SIMCOE, ONTARIO N3Y 3W4 I DRAWiNGNO.
{519) 426-6270 17-0!IS-1:.I'
I
15
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
17
38
43
42
41
40
39
44
48
53 54
37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27
9 10 11 12 13 1476543218
49
50
51
52
474645
TOWN OF
TILLSONBURG
SCALE
500 100
File Number:
Drawn By:
Planner:
Scale:
CAD:
see scale bar
Drawing Number:
METRES
DRAWN / REVISED
First Draft
OX 01
C6
Concept Plan _R4
NJ
5 JAN 2021
DRAFT
FOR DISCUSSION
PURPOSES ONLY
Revision to Street C11 JAN 2021
27 JAN 2021 Revision to Layout
09 MAR 2021 Revision to BLOCK 9
PARTS 4,5 & 6
LAND REGISTARS' COMPLIED PLAN 1653
TOWN OF TILLSONBURG
COUNTY OF OXFORD
Total Site Area:
DEVELOPMENT STATISTICS:
DRAFT PLAN
5.029 ha
LEGEND
Subject Lands
Single Detached Dwelling 54 units
79 unitsTotal
Street Fronting Townhomes (7.5 x 18.6m)25 units
POTTERS GATE PHASE 4
Proposed Sidewalk
KEY PLAN N.T.S.
PROPOSED
OF SUBDIVISION OF
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LANDS TO BE
SUBDIVIDED AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO TO THE ADJACENT
LANDS ARE ACCURATELY AND CORRECTLY SHOWN ON THIS
PLAN.
KIM HUSTED,ONTARIO LAND SURVEYOR
OWNER'S CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY CONSENT TO THE FILING OF THIS PLAN IN DRAFT
FORM FOR APPROVAL.
DATE
OXNARD POTTERS GATE INC.
LAND USE TABLE
PROPOSED DIVISIONS PROPOSED LAND USE
AREA DENSITY
LOT 1 to 54 SINGLE DETACHED DWELLINGS (R2)
BLOCK 1 to 6 (25 UNITS)STREET FRONTING TOWNHOUSES(R3)
2.504 ha (6.189 acre)
0.688 ha (1.702 acre)
8.72 UNITS/acre
14.68 UNITS/acre
BLOCK 7
ROADWAYS ROADWAYS
WALKWAY 0.0094 ha
1.470 ha (3.632 acre)
TOTAL SITE AREA:5.029 ha
BLOCK 8 0.210 ha EXISTING SINGLE DETACHED DWELLING
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
UNDER SECTION 51(17) OF THE PLANNING ACT INFORMATION
REQUIRED BY CLAUSES a, b, c, e, f, g AND j SHOWN ON DRAFT
AND KEY PLANS.
(h) A MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY WILL BE INSTALLED BY THE
DEVELOPER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENT OF THE
COUNTY OF OXFORD.
(i) SOILS ARE GENERALLY COMPRISED SAND AND SANDY SILT ,
SOIL POROSITY - HIGH
(k) MUNICIPAL SERVICES INCLUDING WATER SUPPLY, SANITARY
SEWERS, STORM SEWERS, CURB AND GUTTER, PAVED ROADS,
STREET LIGHTING AND SIDEWALKS WILL BE INSTALLED BY THE
DEVELOPER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF
THE COUNTY OF OXFORD.
(l) NO RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS IN EXCESS OF THE EXISTING
ZONING AND BUILDING BY-LAWS ARE PROPOSED.
DATE
I:\ACAD Projects\2017\1705\01-Model\1705_Concept Plan.dwg, 27/02/2017 2:01:55 PM, CJDLPC22,1:1ANDREWSCROSSING
CONCEPT PLAN
TOWN OF TILLSONBURG
Cyril J. Demeyere Limited
P.O. Box 460, 261 Broadway
Tillsonburg, Ontario. N4G 4H8
Tel: 519-688-1000
866-302-9886
Fax: 519-842-3235
cjdl@cjdleng.com
PHASE 1
PHASE 2
PHASE 1PHASE 2
PHASE 1
PHASE 2REIDSTREET
GR A ND VIEW
D R IVE
DENRICHAVE.JANE
S TREET
QUARTERTOWNLINED ER EH AM DR IVE
GR A ND VIEW
D R IVE
ES S EL TINE
D R IVE DENRI
CHAVENUESANDERSDENRI
CHAVE.
DEREHAM DRIVE
W ILSON AVENUE
DENRICHAVE.A R N O L D
S T R E E T
S A N D E R S C R E S C E N T
DEREHAM
DRIVE
WILSO N AVENUEQUARTERTOWNLINEWILSONAVENUE
D E R E H A M D R I V E
CRESCENTLOWRIECRESCENTARNOLDSTREETVICTORIAWAY
New Dwelling Units by Type
YEAR # NEW SFD # NEW TOWNHOMES
2021 167 171
2020 110 129
2019 90 40
2018 82 35
2017 84 7