Loading...
220215 Boundary Adjustment Committee AgendaPage 1 of 2 The Corporation of the Town of Tillsonburg Boundary Adjustment Advisory Committee February 15, 20222 7:30 a.m. Electronic AGENDA 1.Call to Order 2.Adoption of Agenda Proposed Resolution #1 Moved by: Seconded by: THAT the Agenda as prepared for the Boundary Adjustment Advisory Committee meeting of February 15, 2022, be adopted. 3.Minutes of the Previous Meeting Proposed Resolution #2 Moved by: Seconded by: THAT the Minutes as prepared for the Boundary Adjustment Advisory Committee meeting on January 18, 2021, be adopted. 4.Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest and the General Nature Thereof 5.Presentations $77$&+(' Page 2 of 2 Next Meeting March 15, 2022 at 7:30 a.m. Adjournment Proposed Resolution #3 Moved by: Seconded by: THAT the February 15, 2022 Boundary Adjustment Advisory Committee meeting be adjourned at _____ a.m. 8. Round Table 9. 7 7 . General Business and Reports6. 6.1 Tillsonburg Residential Land Supply – Updated memo, Mapping and Density Information 6.1.1 Planning Recommendation re updated Hemson Population Report 6.2 Census 2021 Initial Release – Tillsonburg Population and Growth Update (ATTACHMENTS 1 2 3) (ATTACHED) Page 1 of 3 The Corporation of the Town of Tillsonburg Boundary Adjustment Advisory Committee November 16, 2021 7:30 a.m. Electronic MINUTES Present: Andrew Burns, Dave Beres (Chair), Cedric Tomico, Jesse Goossens, Samantha Hamilton Staff present: Kyle Pratt, CAO Kennedy Atkinson, Acting Executive Assistant Cephas Panschow, Development Commissioner Eric Gilbert, Senior Planner for Oxford County 1.Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 7:32 a.m. 2.Adoption of Agenda Resolution #1 Moved by: Cedric Tomico Seconded by: Jesse Goossens THAT the Agenda as prepared for the Boundary Adjustment Advisory Committee meeting of November 16, 2021, be adopted. Carried 3.Minutes of the Previous Meeting Resolution #2 Page 2 of 3 Moved by: Cedric Tomico Seconded by: Jesse Goossens THAT the Minutes as prepared for the Boundary Adjustment Advisory Committee meeting of October 19th, 2021, be adopted. Carried 4.Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest and the General Nature Thereof There were no disclosures of pecuniary interest declared. Resolution #3 Moved by: Cedric Tomico Seconded by: Samantha Hamilton THAT the committee move into closed session at 7:37 a.m. to consider a proposed or pending Acquisition or disposition of land by the municipality or local board. Carried 5. Presentations 5.1 Eric Gilbert, Senior Planner, Oxford County Re: Oxford Planning Briefing Memo dealt with in Closed Session. 6. Round Table The Committee resumed open session at 8:11 a.m. 6.Next Meeting December 21, 2021 at 7:30 a.m. – This meeting has been rescheduled to January 18th 2021. It is requested that Eric Gilbert’s team provide information on Industrial land expansion. 7.Adjournment Resolution #4 Moved by: Jesse Goossens Seconded by: Andrew Burns Page 3 of 3 THAT the November 16, 2021 Boundary Adjustment Advisory Committee meeting be adjourned at 8:15 a.m. Carried 1 / 1 BRIEFING NOTE Tillsonburg Residential Land Supply Update Updated February 10, 2022 CPO staff have quickly reviewed the spreadsheet that was shared by the Committee and have identified a number of comments and observations for the Committee’s consideration, as follows: As previously shared with the Committee, CPOs year end 2021 residential supply estimate for the Town (with updates to year end 2021) is approximately 3,000 lots/units. This estimate of total units is comprised of the following: o 1,200 unbuilt lots/units remaining in known/approved development in the Town (Note: many of these development did not appear to be captured in the spreadsheet); o 1,800 estimated lots/units that could be accommodated on the remaining undeveloped residential lands within the Town. These estimates are currently based on the methodology contained in the Hemson 2020 study, which is generally as follows: Applying a gross to net adjustment factor to the gross developable land area (i.e. the total parcel size with undevelopable areas such as flood plains and protected natural features removed) of each parcel to estimate the net developable land area; multiplying the estimated net developable land area of each parcel by the estimated average net residential density (i.e. 22 units per net hectare in the Hemson study) for new development to calculate the total unit potential for each parcel and then totaling to determine the total lot/unit potential on such lands. In comparison, the calculations in the spreadsheet provided by the Committee appear to be attempting to estimate the gross density for a number of sample developments and then applying that to the gross parcel sizes for the remaining development lands (Note: It was difficult to determine if land inventory in the provided spreadsheet captured all such lands) in the Town. The difficulty with such an approach, is that the proportion of the total parcel area that is not developable can range considerably from parcel to parcel (i.e. from zero to a considerable proportion of the total parcel area) as can the gross vs. net density in different developments (i.e. not every development/phase has blocks for parks, storm water management ponds, schools, churches and/or other ICI uses). As such, converting to net residential land area and density (as per the Hemson, 2020 study methodology) tends to provide a more accurate and consistent indication of development densities and lot/unit potential on such development lands. Even then, it is recognized that net development density and net to gross conversion factor assumptions can have a considerable impact on the land supply calculation, which is why a relatively conservative density of 22 units/net ha and gross to net conversion factor of 55% was used in the Hemson, 2020 study to ensure the net residential land area and associated residential land supply estimates were not over estimated. As previous indicated, the intent is to formally update the growth forecasts and land needs study and related assumptions and conclusions next year (i.e. 2023), taking into consideration the 2021 Census information and various changes in development and growth trends that may have occurred since the last study was completed. Prepared by: Paul Michiels, Manager of Planning Policy Circulated to: Town of Tillsonburg Boundary Adjustment Committee 25.6 ha12.7 ha11.2 ha 8.7 ha 7.6 ha 28.2 ha 7.9 ha 5.3 ha 2.7 ha 4.4 ha 2.7 ha 1.3ha 0.92 ha 0.59 ha Town of Tillsonburg - Land Supply Analysis 15-Feb-22 Template by Jesse Goossens, Additional info County Planning Purpose: To determine the total supply of land based on example subdivisions that represent a good samp Notes: Red font indicates developments that have been added by County Planning Green Denotes Developments that are Built-out Projected Total Units - Based on Gross Land Area Hectares Acres # Units Unts/A Rolling Meadows (Phase 2)11 28 194 7.0 Lindprop (Phase 3)28 69 480 7.0 Cranberry Road Property (East Side)1 3 22 7.0 67 Cranberry Rd (TVDSB)26 63 443 7.0 Ambrus (west of Cranberry, north of trail)9 21 151 7.0 The Links (Fairway St)5 11 80 7.0 Victoria Wood (West of QTL, S of Concession St W)40 99 696 7.0 Retsinas (Concession & Wilson Ave)0.6 1.4 10 7.0 Westwinds (Southside) - Medium Density Blocks 2 5 36 7.0 Potters Rd (West of Rail Line)5 13 92 7.0 Simcoe St Lands (Jacko)4 9 63 7.0 131 324 2,266 Sample Developments (Units/Gross Area) Hectares Acres # Units Unts/A North Crest Phase 2 (North Side)16 40 273 6.8 Lindprop Phase 2 14 36 244 6.8 Ambrus 4 11 49 4.4 Potters Gate Phase 4 5 12 79 6.4 Potters Gate Phase 2 1 3 22 7.4 Potters Gate Phase 3 5 12 88 7.2 Bridges at Tillsonburg Proposed Dev't 12 30 89 3.0 Northcrest Phase 1 (South Side)10 24 158 6.5 360 West 2 5 104 19.4 West Winds (Southside Group)11 28 103 3.7 Andrews Crossing 13 31 183 5.9 136 Concession St W 1 1 49 38.5 Victoria Woods (Remaining Oaks Phases)2 6 32 5.2 13 Wren Court 0 0 10 24.2 98 King St 1 2 49 31.5 143 Tillson Avenue 0 1 49 46.5 83 Rolph St 1 2 46 20.2 3 John Pound Road 0 1 33 34.6 101 North Street East 3 6 59 9.2 Units/H 17.3 17.3 17.3 17.3 17.3 17.3 17.3 17.3 17.3 17.3 17.3 Units/H 16.8 16.8 11.0 15.7 18.2 17.7 7.3 16.1 47.9 9.1 14.5 95.1 13.0 59.9 77.7 114.9 49.9 85.5 22.7 360 QTL Developments 2 1 64 67.1 105 255 1783 7.0 Total Supply 4,049 Less Developed 434 Net Remaining Lots (Approved and raw lands)3,615 Annual consumption Year Homes town/aprt Total 2017 84 7 91 2018 82 35 117 2019 90 40 130 2020 110 129 239 2021 167 171 338 2022 2023 5 Year Average 183 25 year Demand 4575 Years Supply 19.76 Note the trend line indicates 2023's growth would be 425 units. 165.7 Fully Built Out 17.2 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Residential Growth Homes town/aprt Total Linear (Total) 2023 Population - Census 2021 Oxford County Geographic name Population, 2021 Population, 2016 Population percentage change, 2016 to 2021 Geographic name Population, 2021 Population, 2016 Population % change, 2016 to 2021 Tillsonburg 18,615 15,872 17.3 Blandford-Blenheim 7,565 7,399 2.2 Aylmer 7,492 7,699 2.8 East Zorra-Tavistock 7,841 7,113 10.2 London 543,551 494,069 10.0 Ingersoll 13,693 12,757 7.3 St. Thomas 42,840 38,909 10.1 Norwich 11,151 10,835 2.9 Simcoe 16,121 14,649 10.0 South-West Oxford 7,583 7,634 -0.7 Stratford 33,232 31,470 5.6 Tillsonburg 18,615 15,872 17.3 Woodstock 46,705 41,098 13.6 Oxford County 121,781 110,846 9.9 Zorra 8,628 8,138 6.0 Middlesex Centre 18,928 17,262 9.7 Oxford County 121,781 110,846 9.9 Norfolk County 67,490 64,044 5.4 Perth 81,565 76,812 6.2 Toronto 2,794,356 2,731,571 2.3 Ontario 14,223,942 13,448,494 5.8 Canada 36,991,981 35,151,728 5.2 -5 0 5 10 15 20 TillsonburgWoodstockEast Zorra-TavistockSt. ThomasLondonSimcoeIngersollZorraStratfordNorwichAylmerBlandford-BlenheimSouth-West Oxford Population Percentage Change, 2016 to 2021 Population % change, 2016 to 2021