210406 AAC AGDThe Corporation of the Town of Tillsonburg
Accessibility Advisory Committee
April 6, 2021
2:00 p.m.
Electronic Meeting
AGENDA
1.Call to Order
2.Adoption of Agenda
Proposed Resolution #1
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the Agenda as prepared for the Accessibility Advisory Committee meeting of
April 6, 2021, be approved.
3.Minutes of the Previous Meeting (Attached)
4.Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest and the General Nature Thereof
5.Presentations/Delegations
5.1. Wayfinding Signage (Attached)
Cephas Panschow, Development Commissioner and Karen Keller, Economic
Development & Marketing Coordinator
6.General Business & Reports
6.1. Kinsmen Pedestrian Bridge (Staff Report OPS 21-10 Attached)
6.2. Accessibility Status Update 2020 (Staff Report CS 21-09 Attached)
6.3. Transit Update
6.4. Optimist Park Playground (playground renderings attached)
6.5. Curb cuts downtown
6.6. Training opportunities
6.7. Oxford County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee meeting – November 8,
2021
7.Next Meeting
June 8, 2021 at 2:00 p.m.
8. Adjournment
Proposed Resolution #2
Moved by:
Seconded by:
THAT the April 6, 2021, Accessibility Advisory Committee meeting be adjourned at
_____ p.m.
The Corporation of the Town of Tillsonburg
Accessibility Advisory Committee
December 29, 2020
2:00 p.m.
Electronic Meeting
MINUTES
Present: Cindy Allen, Erin Getty, Jeff Huber, Councillor Pete Luciani, Margaret
McCrimmon, Peter Staley.
Regrets: Mark Dickson, Mike Cerna, and Michael Kadey.
Also Present:
Amelia Jaggard, Deputy Clerk
Emily Xuereb, Deputy Chief Building Official
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 2:01 p.m.
2. Adoption of Agenda
Proposed Resolution #1
Moved by: Jeff Huber
Seconded by: Margaret McCrimmon
THAT the Agenda as prepared for the Accessibility Advisory Committee meeting of
December 1, 2020, be adopted.
Carried.
3. Minutes of the Previous Meeting (Attached)
4. Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest and the General Nature Thereof
No disclosures of pecuniary interest were declared.
5. Presentations/Delegations
6. General Business & Reports
6.1. Kinsmen Pedestrian Bridge
There was discussion regarding the usage of the bridge.
Councillor Luciani provided an update regarding the bridge.
Concerns regarding the safety of the current bridge surface were noted.
Staff noted that the project is targeted for 2023. An additional inspection report
has been completed on the structure. Staff intend to bring additional information
and associated costs for Council’s consideration in spring of 2021.
There was discussion regarding possible temporary measures to address safety
concerns.
The following resolution was passed.
Resolution:
Moved by: Jeff Huber
Seconded by: Margaret McCrimmon
THAT the Accessibility Advisory Committee has concerns related to the safety of
the surface of the Kinsmen Pedestrian Bridge in inclement weather;
AND THAT the Committee recommend to Council that the Town take additional
measures to improve the safety of the bridge surface in inclement weather by
ensuring all boards are screwed down, adding anti-slip adhesives and
enhancing winter maintenance.
Carried.
6.2. Broadway PXO visibility concern
There was discussion regarding the visibility concern.
It was suggested that another no stopping sign should be installed nearby.
Staff is going to ask ERTH (PXO Contractor) for any measurements or
strategies they recommend to improve the visibility of this PXO. One option on
the table is to install sun shields.
There was discussion about new crosswalks and how to use them.
6.3. Stickers at crosswalk near South Ridge Update
Staff noted that the stickers at the cross walk near South Ridge were placed
there by the crossing guard to indicate social distancing requirements for
students. It is likely that the snowplows will remove the stickers.
6.4. Outdoor accessibility reviews
There was discussion regarding planning for outdoor accessibility reviews in
2021.
6.5. Upcoming projects for AAC Review
Staff noted that there are no upcoming projects requiring the Committee’s
review. The 2021 Town budget has not yet been approved.
7. Next Meeting
Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 2:00 p.m.
8. Adjournment
Proposed Resolution #2
Moved by: Councillor Luciani
Seconded by: Margaret McCrimmon
THAT the December 1, 2020, Accessibility Advisory Committee meeting be
adjourned at 2:53 p.m.
Carried.
Economic Development & Tourism
Wayfinding Signage
DRAFT 04.2021
2021
1. 2
2021 Wayfinding Signage - Design & Strategy.............................................................................................Page 4 - 6
Access Points....................................................................................................................................................................................................Page 7
Wayfinding Signage - Formats..............................................................................................................................................Page 9
Wayfinding Signage - Signs & Locations...............................................................................................................Page 10 - 63
Wayfinding Signage - Gateway Signs.........................................................................................................................Page 64 - 66
Next Steps..................................................................................................................................................................................................Page 67
Appendix......................................................................................................................................................................................................Page 69- 71
Routing .........................................................................................................................................................................................................................Page 8
Wayfinding Signage - Current.................................................................................................................................................Page 3
1. 3
WAYFINDING SIGNAGE • CURRENT
1. 4
1. Design updates:
• current brand image
• clean & simple design
• larger, blue font (“Tillsonburg blue”) presented on a white background,
for high contrast and improved readability
2. Emphasis on the Downtown area
• Design elements include a blue callout box with the words ‘Downtown’ and
the Downtown logo, where possible
• Promotes the Downtown as a key destination for visitors and residents
• Keeps the Downtown area top-of-mind, in support of a 'shop local' mindset
2021 WAYFINDING SIGNAGE • DESIGN & STRATEGY
1. 5
4. Large entrance signs also serve as 'Brag Boards'
5. New or enhanced signage for tourism locations
• Supports key tourism attractions including; the Community Centre,
Soccer Park and Waterpark
• Helps visitors find these key tourism attractions
• When exiting tourism attractions, new signage will direct departing visitors
to the downtown area and promote Tillsonburg’s amenities in general
6. Additional locations added to wayfinding:
• Annandale Ball Diamonds, Cemetery, Lake Lisgar, Memorial Park,
Tillson Ave Businesses, The Great Trail and the Transfer Station
2021 WAYFINDING SIGNAGE • DESIGN & STRATEGY
1. 6
Keep it simple
- Clear, consistent and concise
Show only what is needed
- Information shown is relevant to the space, location and / or navigation path
No excessive information
- Unnecessary elements are excluded to create a clear visual environment ahead
Make it easy to read
- Font size and contrast are maximized
WAYFINDING BEST PRACTICES OBSERVED
2021 WAYFINDING SIGNAGE • DESIGN & STRATEGY
1. 7
x
x
x
ACCESS POINTS
x
NEW
NEW
Gateway Signage
LEGEND
Entrance Signage
No Signage
- Secondary entrances accessed
by local/rural traffic
x
Gateway Signage
1. 8
ROUTING
Traffic is directed onto
Broadway and flows into
into the downtown area.
1. 9
LARGE ENTRANCE SIGNS MEDIUM
DIRECTIONAL SIGNS
SMALL
DIRECTIONAL SIGNS
(replaces blades)
96” W X 96”H 60”W X 96”H 36”W X 36”H &
6” font size 6” font size 4” font size
Wayfinding & Tourism “Brag Boards”
MEDIUM NARROW
DIRECTIONAL SIGNS
46”W x 72”H
5.5” font size
36”W X 42”H
NEW WAYFINDING SIGNAGE • FORMATS
1. 10
SIGNS & LOCATIONS
1. 11
BROADWAY (SOUTHBOUND)
Gateway Signage
LEGEND
Entrance Signage
NEW
1. 12
Location: Broadway (southbound) - North Entrance
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Large Wayfinding
96”W x 96”H
YES
YES
• Relocate existing sign north of
current site
Proposed: Sobey's intersection
(as shown)
1. 13
Location: Broadway (southbound) at Lisgar Ave
Medium sign replaces existing blades
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Medium Narrow Wayfinding
46”W x 72”H
YES
YES
• Install 2 medium signs at Lisgar entrance
NEW
1. 14
Location: Broadway (southbound) at Lisgar Ave
Ravine area >
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Custom Wayfinding
72”W x 46”H
YES
YES
• Double-sided sign on Broadway, across from Lisgar Ave in ravine
area
NEW
1. 15
Location: Broadway (southbound) at Glendale Dr
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Small Wayfinding
36”W x 36”H
NO
NO
• replace existing blades
1. 16
Location: Broadway (southbound) at Sanders St
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Small Wayfinding
36”W x 36”H
YES
YES
• Install new sign and posts
NEW
1. 17
Location: Broadway (southbound) at Waterpark (just past Niagara St)
NEW
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Small Wayfinding
36”W x 36”H
YES
YES
• Install new sign and posts
1. 18
Location: Broadway (southbound) at Waterpark (John St)
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Custom Wayfinding
72”W x 46”H
YES
YES
• Remove existing signage & posts
• Install new signage & posts
1. 19
Location: Broadway (southbound) towards Concession St, at Gowrie
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Small Wayfinding
36”W x 42”H
YES
YES
• Install new sign and posts
NEW
1. 20
Broadway (southbound) - entering Downtown
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Medium Wayfinding
60”W x 96”H
YES
YES
• Previous sign was removed for construction
• Install new sign and posts
1. 21
Broadway downtown
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Small Wayfinding
36”W x 42”H
NO
NO
• Update signage
• Remove current blades and circular sign
1. 22
Broadway (southbound) at Baldwin St
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Medium Narrow Wayfinding
46”W x 72”H
NO
NO
• Update signage
1. 23
BROADWAY (NORTHBOUND)
NEW
Gateway Signage
LEGEND
Entrance Signage
1. 24
Broadway (northbound) at Baldwin St
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Medium Wayfinding
60”W x 96”H
YES
YES
• Remove current post
• Post construction for medium size sign required
1. 25
Broadway (northbound) at Bridge St
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Small Wayfinding
36”W x 42”H
NO
NO
• Updated signage
• Remove current blades
1. 26
Broadway (northbound) at Concession St
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Small Wayfinding
36”W x 42”H
YES
NO
• Updated signage
• Installed on hydro pole
NEW
1. 27
Broadway (northbound) at Sanders St
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Small Wayfinding
36”W x 36”H
YES
NO
• Updated signage
• Installed on hydro pole
NEW
1. 28
Broadway (northbound) before Lisgar Ave
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Small Wayfinding
36”W x 42”H
YES
NO
• New signage
• Installed on hydro pole
NEW
1. 29
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Medium Narrow Wayfinding
46”W x 72”H
YES
YES
• Install new sign and post
Lisgar Ave - Community Centre entrance
NEW
1. 30
Lisgar Ave - Community Centre exit at Broadway
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Small Wayfinding
36”W x 36”H
YES
YES
• Install new sign and post
NEW
1. 31
Broadway (northbound) at North St
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Small Wayfinding
36”W x 36”H
NO
NO
• Update signage
• Replaces blades
1. 32
TILLSON AVE (SOUTHBOUND)
Gateway Signage
LEGEND
Entrance Signage
NEW
1. 33
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Red’d?
Notes: Medium Wayfinding
60”W x 96”H
YES
YES
• Install new sign and post
Cranberry Rd (southbound) at Tillson Ave
NEW
1. 34
Tillson Ave (southbound) at Fourth St
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Small Wayfinding
36”W x 36”H
NO
NO
• Update signage
• Replaces blades
1. 35
Fourth St at Lisgar Ave
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Small Wayfinding
36”W x 36”H
YES
NO
• New signage
• Installed on hydro pole
NEW
1. 36
Tillson Ave (southbound) at Concession St
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Small Wayfinding
36”W x 36”H
YES
YES
• Install new sign and post
NEW
1. 37
TILLSON AVE (NORTHBOUND)
Gateway Signage
LEGEND
Entrance Signage
NEW
1. 38
Tillson Ave (northbound) at Concession St
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Small Wayfinding
36”W x 42”H
YES
NO
• New signage
• Replaces OPP sign (remove yellow OPP sign)
• Installed on hydro pole
NEW
1. 39
Concession St (eastbound) at Tillson Ave
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Small Wayfinding
36”W x 42”H
YES
NO
• New signage
• Installed on hydro pole
NEW
1. 40
Tillson Ave at Trail entrance
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Small Wayfinding (x2)
36”W x 36”H
YES
NO
• New signage (x2)
• Installed on hydro pole (2 sides)
NEW
1. 41
NORTH ST (WESTBOUND) & QUARTER TOWN LINE (SOUTHBOUND)
Gateway Signage
LEGEND
Entrance Signage
NEW
1. 42
Location: North St (westbound) - Entrance
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Large Wayfinding
96”W x 96”H
NO
NO
• replace existing large sign
Option1: Update current signage
1. 43
Location: North Street (westbound) - Entrance
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Medium Wayfinding
60”W x 96”H
YES
YES
• Remove existing large sign
• Replace with medium sign (as shown here) so that the signage is
closer to the road for improved readability
Option 2 (Preferred): format change
1. 44
Location: North St (westbound) at Broadway
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Medium Wayfinding
60”W x 96”H
YES
YES
• Install new sign just prior to the private driveway, as shown
• Requires posts
NEW
1. 45
North St (westbound) before Quarter Town Line
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Small Wayfinding
36”W x 36”H
YES
NO
• New signage
• Installed on hydro pole
NEW
1. 46
Quarter Town Line - at Soccer Club exit
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Medium Narrow Wayfinding
46”W x 72”H
YES
YES
• Install new sign and post
NEW
1. 47
Quarter Town Line - prior to Concession St
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Small Wayfinding
36”W x 36”H
YES
NO
• New signage
• Installed on hydro pole
NEW
1. 48
Quarter Town Line at Baldwin St
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Small Wayfinding
36”W x 36”H
YES
NO
• New signage
• Installed on hydro pole
NEW
1. 49
SIMCOE ST / OXFORD RD (EASTBOUND)
Gateway Signage
LEGEND
Entrance Signage
1. 50
Oxford St (eastbound) - before Tillson Ave
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Small Wayfinding
36”W x 36”H
NO
NO
• New signage
1. 51
Oxford St (eastbound) at Old Vienna Rd
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Small Wayfinding
36”W x 36”H
YES
YES
• Install new sign and post
NEW
1. 52
Simcoe St (eastbound) at Cedar St
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Small Wayfinding
36”W x 36”H
NO
NO
• Update signage
• Replaces blades
1. 53
Simcoe St (eastbound) before cemetary
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Small Wayfinding
36”W x 36”H
YES
NO
• New signage
• Installed on hydro pole
NEW
1. 54
SIMCOE ST / OXFORD RD (WESTBOUND)
Gateway Signage
LEGEND
Entrance Signage
1. 55
Simcoe St (westbound) - Entrance
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Large Wayfinding
96”W x 96”H
NO
NO
• replace existing large sign
1. 56
Simcoe St (westbound) at Potters Rd
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Small Wayfinding
36”W x 36”H
NO
NO
• Update signage
• Replaces blades on hydro pole
1. 57
Simcoe St (westbound) at Vienna Rd
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Small Wayfinding
36”W x 36”H
YES
NO
• New signage
• Installed on hydro pole
NEW
1. 58
Oxford St (Hwy 19) & Vienna Rd - Entrance
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Large Wayfinding
96”W x 96”H
NO
NO
• replace existing large sign
1. 59
Oxford St (westbound) at Tillson Ave
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Small Wayfinding
36”W x 42”H
NO
NO
• New signage
• Remove existing blade
• Installed on hydro pole
1. 60
Oxford St (westbound) at Broadway
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Red’d?
Notes: Medium Narrow Wayfinding
46”W x 72”H
NO
NO
• Update signage
1. 61
HWY #3 - ENTRANCES
NEW
Gateway Signage
LEGEND
Entrance Signage
1. 62
Vienna Rd (northbound) at Hwy 3 - Entrance
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Large Wayfinding
96”W x 96”H
NO
NO
• replaces existing large sign
1. 63
John Pound Rd (northbound) at Hwy 3 - Entrance
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Req’d?
Notes: Large Wayfinding
96”W x 96”H
YES
YES
• Install new sign and post
NEW
1. 64
GATEWAY SIGNS
1. 65
Location 1: North Broadway Entrance (southbound)
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Red’d?
Notes: Gateway Sign
NO
• No change to site location
• Recommend rebuilding planter box & replanting
GATEWAY SIGNAGE
1. 66
Location 2: Hwy 3 at Clearview Dr
Sign Type:
Sign Size:
New Sign Location?
New Posts Red’d?
Notes: Gateway Sign
NO
• No change to site location
• Recommend rebuilding planter box & replanting
1. 67
NEXT STEPS / TIMELINE (TENTATIVE)
• Brand compliance review - underway
• Memorial Park Revitalization Committee - March 17
• Accessibility Committee - April 6
• Manager's Meeting - April 7
• Economic Development Advisory Council - April 13
• BIA Board of Management - April 20
• Council - April 26
• Public Consult (?)
1. 68
FEEDBACK / COMMENTS
1. 69
APPENDIX
1. 70
Broadway northbound at John
(Water Park)
Broadway at Bridge
(Kinsmen Bridge & Arts Centre)
REMOVE SIGNS/BLADES In addition to sign removals noted previously, the following signs need to be removed
to avoid unnecessary duplication and visual clutter.
Broadway at Concession
(pole moved north, at Gowrie)
1. 71
Broadway southbound at Ridout
(St John Church)
Broadway southbound at Brock
(St Andrews Church)
Broadway northbound at Brock
(Museum)
Tillson Ave northbound at Brock
(Museum)
NO CHANGES
Page 1 of 5
Subject: Kinsmen Pedestrian Bridge
Report Number: OPD 21-10
Department: Engineering
Submitted by: Shayne Reitsma, P.Eng, Manager of Engineering
Meeting Type: Council Meeting
Meeting Date: Monday, March 22, 2021
RECOMMENDATION
THAT Council receives report OPD 21-10 as information;
AND THAT Council authorize staff to complete a Schedule C Environmental
Assessment study and detailed design of the preferred solution;
AND THAT Council give 2022 pre-budget approval for the detailed design project
pertaining to the Kinsmen Pedestrian Bridge of $306,000.
BACKGROUND
As part of the provincially mandated Ontario Structural Inspections (OSIM) the Town
completed an enhanced inspection of the Kinsmen pedestrian bridge due to the current
state of the bridge and the growing safety concerns provided by staff and Council.
The enhanced inspection provided by Vallee Consulting Engineers (Vallee) confirmed
that the bridge is in need of repair and that the service life of the bridge is nearing it’s
end if no maintenance/repair is completed.
DISCUSSION
The Kinsmen Bridge is a nine-span steel deck plate girder structure with a southwest -
northwest orientation and a substructure that features cut stone masonry block piers
and abutments. The bridge was constructed in 1888 to carry GWR CAL railway over
Stoney Creek, and was converted to a pedestrian bridge following the abandonment of
the railway in the 1990’s.
Following the structural report provided by Vallee, the Town contracted ASI
Archaeological & Cultural Heritage Services (ASI) to complete a Cultural Heritage
Evaluation Report. This was done to determine whether or not Kinsmen Pedestrian
Bridge was deemed Historical/Heritage value. The determination of being Historical/
OPD 21-10
Page 2 of 5
Heritage value is significant in terms of construction being that it will limit what can be
done to the bridge.
ASI’s report used the O. Reg. 9/06: Criteria for Determining Cultural Heritage Value or
Interest and Ontario Heritage Act to determine the historical/ heritage value :
1. Is a rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type, expression,
and material or construction method – Yes, based on age and construction.
2. Has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity,
organization, or institution that is significant to a community – Yes, this bridge
has direct associations with the theme of railway development in Tillsonburg
and the construction of the rail line. This rail line was instrumental in shaping
the historical transportation, commerce, and settlement in the local area.
3. Is important in defining, maintaining or supporting the character of an area; -
Yes, the Kinsmen Pedestrian Bridge provides access to pedestrians and
cycles over Stoney Creek.
4. Is physically, functionally, visually or historically linked to its surroundings; -
Yes, The location of the subject bridge has ser ved as a historical bridging
point with rail traffic in the Town of Tillsonburg and is physically associated
with the GWR CAL railway and GWR Tillsonburg Station. This railway and the
station were instrumental in shaping the commercial and transportation
development of the area.
Given the above responses based on O. Reg. 9/06 the structure is considered to have
cultural heritage value.
With ASI’s determination that the Kinsmen Bridge has heritage value the Municipal
Class Environmental Assessment as part of the Environmental Assessment Act
designates this project as a Schedule B or C pending the overall cost of the project
being higher or lower than 2.4 million. With Schedule B being the lesser value.
As part of the Enhanced OSIM the Town required replace/maintenance options for the
Kinsmen bridge which are summarized below:
1. Do Nothing:
This option is self-explanatory, but it is important to note that delaying the
decision on what to do with this bridge will require consideration of the
consequence of doing nothing at this time. To do nothing will not incur short
term construction costs, but will require scheduled inspections or an
unplanned repairs or closure. Estimated cost $80,000.
2. Close the Bridge
This option would require modest work to be done in order to close the bridge
to pedestrian traffic, such as approach barriers, signage, etc. It also would
OPD 21-10
Page 3 of 5
require consideration of the eventual decision to demolish or replace the
structure. Estimated cost $337,500
3. Repair – Wood Deck
Replace wood deck and structural supports. Estimated cost $3,300,000
4. Repair – Steel Deck
Replace wood deck with steel and structural supports. Estimated cost
$3,850,000
5. Replace – Like for Like
This is the highest cost option, but it has a long lifespan and truly replaces the
heritage railway bridge with a look alike heritage railway bridge. The cost
below reflects a replacement railway bridge, ‘Like-for-Like’ as shown in the
OSIM report estimates. A new bridge however, is not required to carry train
loads any longer, and never will be required to do so. For this reason, a new
pedestrian bridge at the same height elevation has also been considered (see
below), but this option has been included for comparative purposes.
Estimated cost $4,375,000
6. Replace – High elevation pedestrian bridge
This option has a high cost but it has the longest lifespan and the greatest
functionality. The actual cost of this option may vary significantly depending
on the type and style of bridge design chosen. A more modest replacement
pedestrian bridge that isn’t required to carry train or traffic loading could be
designed and constructed for a much lower cost than a ‘Like -for-Like’ option.
Estimated cost $2,250,000
7. Replace – Valley Path
This option is the lower cost replacement option. It has a similarly long
lifespan as the Like-for-Like or High Elevation replacement but it has reduced
functionality due to the required barrier free accessible switchback paths up
the embankments. Estimated cost $1,250,000
Each option was considered with the following criteria and given an overall score that
can be seen in Table 1.
Accessibility & Functionality: /20
How accessible is the option being considered? Does it present additional
challenges or does it remove barriers to the path of travel? Lower challenges and
barriers to the path of travel result in better functionality and a higher score.
Aesthetics & Heritage: /15
Does the option have aesthetic appeal? Is the visual appearance sympathetic to
the heritage value of the existing structure? Better visual appeal and lower
impacts to heritage aesthetics result in a higher score.
OPD 21-10
Page 4 of 5
Durability & Lifespan: /20
Does the option have durable materials that do not require periodic repair and
replacement? Assuming that needed repairs and maintenance is carried out,
does the option have a short, medium, or long term life expectancy? More
durable options that require less maintenance and have a long lifespan result in a
higher score.
Safety & Liability: /15
It is assumed that regulatory requirements (ie CHBDC, etc.) will be met, but are
there hazards that may pose a liability to the Town? Lower risks result in a higher
score.
Construction Cost: /30
How does the cost of construction compare to the other considered options ?
Lower costs result in a higher score.
TOTAL: /100
The sum total of all considered categories represent a score out of 100 points.
The highest score being the more desirable option using the weighted criteria
considered.
Table 1- Option Summary
OPTIONS COST OVERALL SCORE
1. Do Nothing $80,000 46
2. Close Bridge $337,500 49
3. Rehab – Wood Deck $3,300,000 54
4. Rehab – Steel Deck $3,850,000 73
5. Replace – Like for Like $4,375,000 66
6. Replace – High Elevation
bridge
$2,250,000 78
7. Replace – Valley Path $1,250,000 71
Based on Vallee’s cost estimates and according to the Municipal Class Environmental
Assessment our options are limited to 3, 4 and 5. From Table 1 it can be seen that
option 3, 4 and 5 are over the $2.4 million threshold therefore making this a Schedule C
project. Based on a Town engineering estimate we will require $306,000 to complete
the Schedule C process and provide Council with three conceptual plans and one
detailed design.
CONSULTATION
This report was created in conjunction with ASI and Vallee.
OPD 21-10
Page 5 of 5
FINANCIAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE
The recommended project fee of $306,000 (net HST included) be funded through 2022
taxation. The Engineering Department will continue to explore potential grant
opportunities given the historic structure of the Kinsmen Bridge.
COMMUNITY STRATEGIC PLAN (CSP) LINKAGE
1. Excellence in Local Government☒ Demonstrate strong leadership in Town initiatives
☒ Streamline communication and effectively collaborate within local government
☒ Demonstrate accountability
2. Economic Sustainability
☐ Support new and existing businesses and provide a variety of employment
opportunities
☐ Provide diverse retail services in the downtown core
☐ Provide appropriate education and training opportunities in line with Tillsonburg’s
economy
3. Demographic Balance
☐ Make Tillsonburg an attractive place to live for youth and young professionals
☐ Provide opportunities for families to thrive
☐ Support the aging population and an active senior citizenship
4. Culture and Community
☒ Promote Tillsonburg as a unique and welcoming community
☐ Provide a variety of leisure and cultural opportunities to suit all interests
☒ Improve mobility and promote environmentally sustainable living
ATTACHMENTS
None.
Page 1 of 4
Subject: Accessibility Status Update 2020
Report Number: CS 21-09
Department: Corporate Services
Submitted by: Amelia Jaggard, Deputy Clerk
Meeting Type: Council Meeting
Meeting Date: Monday, February 22, 2021
RECOMMENDATION
THAT Council receives the accessibility status update 2020, as information.
BACKGROUND
The Multi-Year Accessibility Plan 2019-2023 indicates that an annual status report will
be completed to document the progress and measures taken to implement the Town of
Tillsonburg’s strategy and meet the requirements of the Integrated Accessibility
Standards Regulation.
DISCUSSION
2020 Accessibility Achievements
Accessibility achievements in 2020 included:
Playground Equipment Replacement Program – Glendale Park Playground –
Barrier Free Play Structure – Installation April 2021.
Generational Swings – One generational swing was installed at Optimist Park,
Trottier playground and Coronation Park in August 2020.
Sidewalk Connectivity Program Implementation – completed third quarter.
Change in the transit service provider for the in-town service – completed third
quarter.
Launched a fully accessible Inter Community Transit service– completed third
quarter.
Accessibility Advisory Committee
The Accessibility Advisory Committee met twice in 2020.
CS 21-09
Page 2 of 4
At their meeting on December 1, 2020, the Committee passed a resolution
recommending that Council take additional measures to improve the safety of the
Kinsmen Pedestrian Bridge surface in inclement weather. At the December 14, 2020
meeting of Tillsonburg Town Council, the following resolution was passed:
Resolution # 2020-575
Moved By: Councillor Gilvesy
Seconded By: Councillor Rosehart
THAT Council receives the recommendation from the Accessibility Advisory
Committee, as information;
AND THAT Council direct staff to take additional measures to improve the safety
of the Kinsmen Pedestrian Bridge surface in inclement weather by ensuring all
boards are screwed down, adding anti-slip adhesives and enhancing winter
maintenance.
Staff implemented these additional measures in the first quarter of 2021.
The next Accessibility Advisory Committee meeting is scheduled for March 9, 2021.
Oxford County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee
The annual Oxford County Joint Accessibility Advisory Committee meeting was
cancelled in 2020 due to the pandemic.
2021 Projects
The following list of projects were included in the approved 2021 final budget and
departmental business plans. These projects will improve the accessibility of Town
facilities and services.
Customer Service Centre Façade update including the installation of barrier free
sliding doors - second quarter.
Playground Equipment Replacement Program – Optimist Park Playground –
Barrier Free Play Structure – installation May 2021.
Expand Electronic Receivables Acceptance – second quarter.
Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) Website Upgrades –
second quarter.
Additional measures to improve the safety of the Kinsmen Pedestrian Bridge
surface in inclement weather – completed in first quarter.
Airport Website redesign – second quarter.
Sidewalk Connectivity Program Implementation – third quarter.
Transit:
o New fully accessible low floor bus in service – first quarter.
o Bus stop improvements – second quarter.
CS 21-09
Page 3 of 4
o Relocate Stop 6 at Lisgar and VanNorman to improve access to this bus
stop – second quarter.
o Add bus stops along the current route to reduce travel distance to a bus
stop – second quarter.
Parks and Trails Signage Replacement – second quarter.
Facility Booking Software Replacement – first quarter.
Pathway Upgrades – third quarter and subject to grant funding.
Implement Permit Web Portal and Digital Service Delivery – first quarter.
Branding – Wayfinding Signage – third quarter.
Recreation, Culture and Parks Department Comments: Inclusive Play
Inclusive play means creating a play environment that allows for a memorable
interaction for children with their peers or caregivers. People integrate different play
experiences together and place them on similar play routes so that children with limited
mobility or developmental delays have the option to play alongside their peers leaving
no child with a feeling of isolation. A playground is a social place where a child should
feel safe, welcomed and accepted for who they are.
In all the parks we purchase, it is imperative that we create an accessible and inclusive
environment for all users. We ensure that we pay attention to the details so the park is
welcoming for all.
For our users with Sensory Processing Disorder each of the climbers use a dif ferent
texture so that the user can find a climber that is comfortable for them. For our non-
verbal users we ensured there were plenty of social play opportunities that don’t require
verbal communication.
For our users with Down Syndrome who love the spinning motion, spinner units provide
the opportunity for users to spin together with peers creating an inclusive environment.
Lastly, for users with visual impairment, we ensure that a colour contrast on the
structure to establish entries and exits.
We believe that by taking into account the wide range of abilities we see in the
community we have created a playground that can provide an inclusive environment for
all users.
Feedback
The Town of Tillsonburg welcomes public input as feedback helps to identify areas where
changes need to be considered and ways in which we can improve facilities, goods and
services. Should a member of the public wish to provide general feedback, comments or
suggestion on how to improve accessibility in our facilities, goods or services please contact
clerks@tillsonburg.ca or 519-688-3009 ext. 4041 or complete an Accessibility Comment or
Complaint Form as found on the Town of Tillsonburg website at the following link:
https://www.tillsonburg.ca/en/town-hall/Accessibility.aspx
CONSULTATION
Senior Leadership Team.
CS 21-09
Page 4 of 4
FINANCIAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE
Not applicable.
COMMUNITY STRATEGIC PLAN (CSP) LINKAGE
1. Excellence in Local Government
☒ Demonstrate strong leadership in Town initiatives
☒ Streamline communication and effectively collaborate within local government
☒ Demonstrate accountability
2. Economic Sustainability
☐ Support new and existing businesses and provide a variety of employment
opportunities
☐ Provide diverse retail services in the downtown core
☐ Provide appropriate education and training opportunities in line with Tillsonburg’s
economy
3. Demographic Balance
☒ Make Tillsonburg an attractive place to live for youth and young professionals
☒ Provide opportunities for families to thrive
☒ Support the aging population and an active senior citizenship
4. Culture and Community
☒ Promote Tillsonburg as a unique and welcoming community
☐ Provide a variety of leisure and cultural opportunities to suit all interests
☒ Improve mobility and promote environmentally sustainable living
ATTACHMENTS
None.
RCP 21-05 Appendix A
Page 1 of 2
RCP 21-05 Appendix A
Page 2 of 2