161205 Transit Pilot Committee MINCommunity Transportation Pilot Program Steering Committee {Tillsonburg)
Meeting Notes ·
December 5, 2016
Minutes Taker: Deb Clarke Time: 10:00-11:30am
PRESENT: Marty Graf, Chief Executive Officer, Community Living Tillsonburg; John
Verbakel, Chair; Carolijn Verbakel, Community Advocates Tillsonburg;
David Calder, CAO, Town ofTillsonburg; John Preston, Community
Transportation Coordinator; Brian Stephenson, Councilor, Town of
Tillsonburg {left at 10:30); Geoff Reekie, Executive Director Multi-Service
Centre {left at 11 :15).
REGRETS: Ashley Farrar, Social Planning Council Oxford
1. Welcome:
John V. welcomed everyone to the meeting and thanked John P. for providing
the committee package that consist of the following -Agenda, Minutes -
November 14, 2016, Ridership Stats, Ridership Demographics chart and the
United Way 2017+ Funding Application.
2. Adoption of minutes from previous meeting and business arising:
The minutes from November 14, 2016 were reviewed and adopted.
3. Ridership and budget report: John Preston
John introduced Jamie Borden as the newest dispatch for T:GO and advised the
committee that Jamie will be located in the front reception area once we have a
spot for her.
John reviewed the November ridership stats with the committee, the number of
ridership's has dropped slightly in November. John explained that he changed
some of the titles in the purpose section such as -Shopping to Retail Services,
and Youth to Education/Training.
John reviewed the ridership demographics chart as well. We have increased 3%
this month with an average of 31 riders per day. December has just begun and
we had 40 -45 riders so far.
Brian suggested that John P may want to consider approaching the Senior
Centre at the Complex and the Curling Club to advertise the T:GO bus services.
These places may want an alternative to get to their programs during the winter
months.
Geoff commented that we need to continue to show the number in ridership and
with winter coming the ridership will grow again.
Page 1 of 4
4. Report on Provincial Gas Tax application request: John Verbakel
At the council meeting the Mayor asked if the fare would be raised? Who is
asking for the application?
The council has requested that we submit a business plan to them moving
forward.
Are our fares too low and should they be raised? Marty reminded the committee
that the people who are using T:GO do not have a lot of resources and cannot
afford the prices of a cab. It was suggested that we could subsidize the cabs
using the T:GO funds so they would also benefit as people cannot afford the
$8.00 per ride cab fee. The town and cabs could be in favour of this as a
partnership. The Gas Tax is another model that could be used.
We need to get the Gas Tax funding in order to be sustainable. We have built a
good program and it is growing. In the beginning John P. drove the bus, now we
have a Coordinator, two drivers and a dispatcher.
We need to move to more dedicate routes, if we have a true flex route it would be
more costly for gas and maintenance with all of the stops that would be made.
John P. explained the difference between the flex routes and a more purpose
drive route such as with the schedule run in the morning could include going to
the Town Centre Mall instead of just the school run. Our afternoons are more
hectic.
John P. advised the committee that he has received request for out of town runs.
It was suggested that we could dedicate Tuesday's and Thursday's for out of
town appointments such as medical or lawyer appointments etc ... The town
council may be more acceptable of this idea.
We are receiving more calls for wheelchair transportation which gets referred to
Stonebridge.
5. Discussion: How will we be structured after March 31, 2017 when the pilot
phase ends?
David advised that there seems to be some confusion amongst the councilors
about the committee. This committee has been appointed by the council and the
committee reports to council. As a group we are dissolved as of March 31, 2016.
John V. would like to keep the committee going past March 31, 2016.
Carolijn suggested that a chart be created to show the options that people have
as T:GO is much bigger than a bus transit system. T:GO is the newest option in a
much bigger picture by partnering with other organizations.
Community Living Tillsonburg is still willing to take on the role of the lead
organization until another entity wants to take over. Both Community Living
Tillsonburg and the Multi-Service Centre would be supportive to that entity. The
Tillsonburg Community Services Initiative (TCSI} has also been supportive to
T:GO through fundraising dollars.
Page 2 of 4
Stonebridge is not going to be the lead as it does not follow our mandate as the
ridership is more wider based.
The coordinator will direct riders to the types of transportation system that is
needed as it is more than just T:GO.
John P. reported that the other agencies who had received the $100,000.00
funding for the Transportation Pilot Program have been struggling and some are
not running the program any longer. We are still in the proving stages to show
the Municipalities that the people in our community need the affordable
transportation system.
6. Discussion: Draft business plan for moving T:GO forward
The town council wants to see a business plan and it may be forward for staff to
review of what is going to proceed after March 31, 2017. Our business plan
needs to be done more formally with lots of details and shows sustainability.
Marty asked John P. to contact Bill Prett from Norfolk County in regards to their
Business Plan.
We need to get the business plan done by January 9, 2017 our next meeting
and get it to council.
Marty advised the committee that Community Living Tillsonburg has used Fred
Galloway to help us when creating business documents in the pass. Marty
suggested that Fred Galloway could come and help with creating a business
plan. It could be beneficial to spend $600.00 for Fred's services for an afternoon.
It has been decided to invite Fred Galloway to the December 28, 2016 meeting.
The requirements for the United Way is that the applicant be a non-for-profit
agency. Community Living Tillsonburg is a non-for-profit agency and should be
the agency applying as the lead for the funding. The United Way application is
not the only avenue we can take. There are other options such as Trillium
Funding and The Green Municipal Fund -if we can show low emissions etc ...
Geoff suggested that we need to include the taxi cabs in the business plan and
then the town council will need to decide if they will be subsidized.
The drivers and the dispatcher are funded through the Multi-Service Centre
Employment Ontario program.
David will write a letter of support.
7. Work on draft application to United Way for funding: -all
We could apply for funding for one year with the condition that we can re-
applying the following instead of applying for three year funding.
Page 3 of4
8. Next meeting: Wednesday, December 28, 2106 (10:00-11 :30am).
9. Adjournment
Page 4 of 4
The following information is supplemental to the December 5, 2016 Meeting Minutes, as mentioned to
the Committee by John Preston as possible ways to improve T:GO service based on observations of
service and rider requests over the course of the program. More research and review is needed on the
DESIGN IDEAS before implementing.
Needs
Purpose-Designed routes: Undedicated run that combines ride requests during certain periods of
the day for a specific purpose (not necessarily limited to) to be more efficient in terms of service
delivery and costs.
o Greater number of riders
• Work runs: 6:00 -9:30AM, 2:30 -6:00PM
• School runs: 7:30-8:00AM, 2:30-3:00PM
Back-up service: As ridership increases, there have been times during the day when T:GO service
was pushed to capacity to perform based on demand, location, and number of riders. To reduce
strain on T:GO service, it may be necessary to have a back-up/support vehicle during high-
demand times, based on specific purposes.
o Support T:GO Bus during busy periods (2:30PM -4:30PM) and over-capacity (6:00-
7:00AM)
• Medical Appointments
• Random Pick-ups at Mall
Out-of-Town Service: Providing transportation to surrounding communities, as well as
connecting with other Oxford centres, and transportation services, has been on T:GO's radar
since the beginning. Requests by riders have been increasing around accessing T:GO for out-a/-
town rides. T:GO is currently limited to Tillsonburg until a Commercial Vehicle Operators
Registration for the bus (through Community living) is completed.
o Surrounding communities and services
• Employment, retail services
o Connections
• Via Rail, Greyhound
o Social and Medical Services
• Court dates (Monday & Tuesday)
• Specialist appointments (Woodstock)
Weekend Service: Requests for weekend service continue to come into T:GO, some emphasis
placed on the winter months and Sunday Service for whee/choir accessible riders.
o Employment, retail services
Late night employment service (10PM -12AM shift changes): The winter months have been
indicated by some T:GO riders as a concern for getting home from work late at night (weather,
safety). Only one taxi company operates 24/7, and has been a challenge for a few riders to
access -cost and availability.
By-Law Compliance: Administrative requirements under the new Vehicle for Hire By-Law will
require detailed documentation around routes, service, passenger rosters, and fares collected.
o Pre-determined routes and schedules
o Pre-determined stops
o Record-keeping -number of riders at each stop, deviations from route
Direct Accessible Transportation: Combined with a number of requests for wheelchair
accessibility, there has been concern by senior T:GO riders and drivers around the safety/ability
to get on to the T:GO Bus. T:GO does not provide door-to-door service, but has been able to
provide direct (curb-to-curb) service for seniors and individuals known to have limited mobility.
As ridership increases, particularly with a high senior population in Tillsonburg, it will be difficult
to continue providing curb-to-curb service while remaining on schedule with other riders.
o Wheelchair residents -same-day requests
o Senior safety getting on and off bus
o Seniors require direct service due to mobility and weather conditions
o Continue to meet individual needs outside of bus schedule and availability
Multi-directional work runs: Almost all ride requests have been for similar destinations for work,
and can be fit into the current morning and afternoon work run with some flexibility. However, a
couple work requests in the morning have not been provided due to location, time and direction
of the current work run -when possible, modifications to the route have been made, and
continue to be reviewed, but these requests could not be fit in without the addition of a second
vehicle.
o Work run only services industrial areas to the south, cannot provide service outside of
set route and times
Potential T:GO Design
1. Combine T:GO & CAT CAB voucher program
a. T:GO-guaranteed, multi-passenger routes
i. Purpose-designed runs (employment, group transit requests)
ii. Runs designed around increasing demand from CAT: As ridership increases along
a particular route, and time, these rides can be transferred over to the T:GO Bus
b. CAT Cab Voucher
i. Registered Riders -case-by-case, determined by physical, mental challenges
that impede accessing T:GO Bus
ii. Multiple-agency support
iii. Wheelchair/ambulatory vehicle
iv. Valid during daylight hours -intent: medical, social services, community
programs, employment, accessing basic needs, etc.
2. T:GO Transit & Wheel-Trans
a. T:GO Bus: -Flex-route/Build-a-route service
i. Set schedules and routes, with flex-service during key times and places
b. T:GO Wheel-Trans
i. Operated by T:GO
ii. Provides direct-service for seniors, residents with mobility issues, and
wheelchair riders -same price as the bus
1. Registered clients only
3. Multi-Modal/Service Provider Model
a. T:GO -purpose-driven routes (employment, education/training, Food Bank, group
transportation, etc.) in-town
i. Out-of-town service-dial-a-bus community transit (surrounding communities)
ii. Direct service to Woodstock (connection to Via, Greyhound, Court services,
Appointments, etc.)
b. Subsidized taxi fares for registered riders
i. Case-by-case determination (seniors, individuals with disabilities)
ii. In-town subsidization
iii. In-town wheelchair transit (Scheduled, and 24/7 availability)
iv. Subsidized/organized group employment runs (late night shift changes)
c. Stonebridge/Multi-Service Centre
i. Out-of-town volunteer and wheelchair transit
Report Title T:GO CALL-N-RIDE Operations -Potential Models
Report No. CTPPSC 41-17
T~ Author John Preston
Meeting Type Delegation to Council
Committee January 16, 2017 Date
Attachments • T
RECOMMENDATION
THAT Report CTPPSC 41-17 be received for information;
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report provides information regarding the development of T:GO CALL-N-RIDE to be more
efficient and accessible by the Tillsonburg Community around how service is provided. It also
provides suggestions on how service can be more efficient through the integration of other
service providers using the Provincial Gas Tax Fund to help support such an initiative.
BACKGROUND
T:GO CALL-N-RIDE operates on a blended-service model, combining different forms of Flex-
Route Service -Route deviation, Point Deviation, Flex-Service (Build-a-Route). This has helped
to build ridership but has become increasingly difficult to manage as numbers increase; also the
capacity to provide service with growing demand has diminished and is manageable at 45 rides
or less, however, daily ridership is increasing up to 50, causing scheduling and efficiency
challenges. Typical to rural transportation, travel demands change regularly making predictability
of consistent routes ancf schedules difficult -Routes that were near capacity are now near
empty; pick-up times that were consistent for riders -thereby allowing a set run and schedule to
be established -have disappeared.
However, in order to increase capacity, to demonstrate routes and schedules under the new
Vehicle for Hire By-Law, and make T:GO service more understandable, modifications to the way
T:GO provides community transportation must change.
Flex-Route Service:
The key to the program's success revolves around the flexibility to meet riders' needs. It has
been demonstrated in the past, and even with the T:GO Program, that set routes and times are
not widely used without negotiations from both parties. Even with a flex-route service, there is
the risk of having to decide between running an empty bus around a set location at a specific
time, or put people on the bus even though they may be somewhere else at the time.
Page 1 / 4 CTPPSC Report 41-17 TGO Operations
The attached document T:GO Operations Presentation 2017 outlines different models of flex-
route service. The Point Deviation model best fits "Call-n-Ride" programs, such as T:GO. To
date, T:GO has been using variations of all three models at certain times of the day, depending
on the need.
• Route Deviation: 6AM to 7:30AM (Work Run) and 3PM -3:30PM (Work Run)
• Flex-Route Segments: 9:00AM -10:30AM and 12:00PM -1:30PM (Red, Blue, Orange,
Green Routes), particularly through Hickory Hills and the Simcoe Street areas.
• Point Deviation: 10:30AM -12:00PM, 1:30PM -3:00PM, 3:30PM -5PM (Flex-
Service/B uild-a-route)
Improvements to the service will incorporate more point deviation service throughout the day,
with emphasis on "Check Point" schedules, moving away from general, route deviation service.
This will allow the drivers more independence in schedules and routes to provide scheduling
consistency, yet still maintain the level of flexibility needed by many of the T:GO riders.
Scenario 1 : The driver meets riders in the orange zone at The Livingston Centre and at
Cranberry Corners. One rider wishes to go to Sobey's the other downtown. Under a point
deviation service, the driver can continue along North Street to drop off the one rider at Sobey's
before heading to the next checkpoint at Lisgar Plaza, and then downtown. In this scenario, the
driver is able to make a decision as to the most efficient means of delivering riders to their
destination with minimal delay, yet still meeting the checkpoint times (within reason) of each
zone.
Scenario 2: The bus is scheduled to stop at Baldwin Place and Hickory Hills Association at
10:00AM and 10:10AM respectively. Earlier, a resident of Hickory Hills requested an at-curb
pick-up due to a physical limitation that limits the distance the individual can travel. With most
riders from Hickory Hills, the dispatcher can make a decision as to whether that person can be
met at the end of their street, or requires something closer -many understand the T:GO bus
concept and usually agree with a compromise (weather permitting). The driver will still make the
stops at each main building, and will make the additional stop for the one resident at the most
efficient point on route. Then the driver proceeds to the riders destination.
Scenario 3: The bus makes a scheduled stop at the back of Town Centre Mall (shoppers Drug
Mart side). Three riders board the bus with different destinations. Once the driver has made sure
that no more will board the bus, the driver then proceeds to deliver the riders to a location in their
area, based on the most efficient way. This minimizes extra, unnecessary mileage while
delivering riders to their destination within a reasonable amount of time.
More Accessible and Subsidized Transportation
Limitations in the level of service that T:GO can provide has highlighted the need for a
supplementary transit option as part of or in partnership with T:GO. The possibility of accessing
the Provincial Gas Tax Fund has opened some possibilities.
□ Page2/4 CAO
To determine the best possible option to a subsidized transportation option, an analysis of travel
patterns for Tillsonburg Seniors was performed. Seniors pose a bit of a challenge to T:GO due to
the larger of number of mobility limitations, last-minute ride requests (typically from medical
appointments), and individual travel (by themselves). The attached document T:GO Operations
-Seniors provides a snapshot of senior travel patterns.
From this study, the purpose is summarized as follows:
• To provide transportation to individuals who require a more easily accessible
transportation option through T:GO
• To provide better on-demand service to seniors, particularly for medical
appointments
-Return requests tend to be immediate, and difficult to schedule, causing
delays
Two main options for providing subsidized transportation within Tillsonburg are subsidizing:
• Taxis (as of April 1•1, 2017, the discount rate for seniors will be $8, opposed to the regular
$9 fare)
• Multi-Service Centre (typical $4 fee through volunteer drivers)
Approximately 40% of current senior riders would be "eligible" and/or benefit from an alternative
to the T:GO Bus -plus there are many riders who remain "untapped" due to the limitations that
the T:GO Bus poses. This currently represents 85 trips in the past month.
To subsidize taxis, the monthly cost would be $510 per month, annually $6120. This does not
include fees for additional passengers (50 cents) or stops ($1 ).
To subsidize the Multi-Service Centre, already mandated under LHIN funding to provide 2500
senior trips per year, would be $170 per month, annually $2040.
(Full fare minus Client Pay of $2 equals cost to Transportation Program.)
Requests for an accessible option would require restrictions around scheduling and booking.
There are non-senior residents who could also benefit from an alternative to the T:GO Bus.
Future Development:
• T:GO CALL-N-RIDE should continue to focus on providing "group transportation" within
Tillsonburg,
o Continue to develop 'Point Deviation" scheduling as opportunity permits i.e., as
subscription riders during high demand periods from various points across
Tillsonburg diminish or change, schedules can be modified to provide more
equitable service to under-serviced areas
• Maintain at least 5 riders per service hour, on average
□ Page3/4 CAO
o On-demand and direct service be outsourced to another transportation provider
when possible -MSC, Stonebridge, Taxis -for specific needs, such as medical
appointments
o Extend service to nearby communities as scheduling allows
• Develop an integrated operations plan with the Multi-Service Centre and Stonebridge
Community Services to provide service to seniors and residents who require more
accessible transit for specific purposes, and subsidize through Provincial Gas Tax Fund
o Outsource to taxi companies if demand cannot be met
• Develop plan to provide transportation to workers outside of T:GO hours -10PM -
3AM by tendering service out to private transportation providers for a set annual fee,
rather than per request fare (i.e., taxis)
o Potential to use T:GO Bus after hours to company
o Could serve as a pilot for outsourcing operations to private transportation provider
(e.g., Ride Norfolk}
• Develop county-wide transportation network to begin integration of services that
provides residents and care providers a one-stop-shop line to request ride for specific
needs (medical)
CONSULTATION/COMMUNICATION
Ridership data is reported by Simpli Transport, the coordination software currently being used by
staff to manage clients, and book ride requests.
Demographic information is a combination of direct interaction with the rider, information
provided by a sponsoring agency (Employment Ontario, Stonebridge), or an approximation
(senior, youth) based on location and/or discussions with parents or support workers.
□ Page 4/ 4 CAO
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
45 I
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
178
114 --
1 2
March April
1000 I
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
a: Other••
■Student
■Volunteer
111. Special Olympics
■Daycare
■food Bank
■ Social Services
■ Education/Training
■ Retail Services
■Medical
■ Community Programs
■Work
Ridership Numbers _,,
,., 675 /
--· -__,,,,,,.,
41y
306~
..
165 ---
~ .
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Average Daily Ridership 40
May June July August September Octl-31 Novl-30 Dec 1-31
Trip Purpose
0ctl-31 Novl-30 Decl-31
51 7 13
71 51
6 24 30
0 0 0
18 29 33
7 0 2
6 5 4
61 9 46
70 122 192
40 39 60
18 18 18
362 346 411
Ridershi2 Stats
March 14·31 April 1-30 Mayl-31 Junel-30 Julyl-31 Augl-31 Sepl-30 Octl-31 Novl-30 Decl-31 no
Re2lstered Riders 72 113 136 144 166 182
Total Rides 114 178 165 242 306 410 551 656 675 842
56% -7% 47% 26% 34% 34% 19% 3% 25%
Total Riders 26 19 23 37 39 56 74 71 76 96
Total Subscription Passengers: 7 8 9 9 14 19 21 27 33 32
Avera•e Dallv Ridershin March April May June July August September Octl-31 Nov 1-30 Dec 1-31
8 9 7 11 14 18 26 33 31 40
UAlS 5
p urnose -R eo1stere dRld ers: November December Total
Work 6 8 4 4 7 19 26 25 30 34
Communltv Pro2rams 16 1 2 2 5 3 7 4 7 5
Medical 1 1 2 8 .. • 14 10 11 22
Retail Services 1 7 8 7 9 18 25 18 24 48
Education/Training 1 2 3 3 0 2 6 5 5 3
Social Services 2 0 6 2 4 3 2 2 3
Food Bank 1 2 2 2 0 4 0 1
Students 4 4 5 4
Dav Care 1 D 0 0 1 1 1 2
Special Olvmpics 5 6 5 5 5 0 0 0
Volunteer 2 2 3 2 5 4
Other 1 1 3 13 5 7 15 14 2 7
Multi-Puroose Use* 13 10 18
* Individuals who have used T:GO for more than one purpose
Purnose -Total Trin Count Augl-31 Sepl-30 Octl-31 Novl-30 Decl-31 Total
Work 46 64 41 94 113 197 278 362 346 411
Communltv Programs 16 5 10 10 19 30 18 18 18 18
Medical 1 2 • 19 6 5 31 40 •• 60
Retail Services 1 9 12 22 81 80 91 70 122 192
Education/Training 4 10 8 16 0 10 44 61 9 46
Social Services 1 0 11 2 5 3 6 5 4
Food Bank 1 1 4 4 3 0 7 0 2
Day Care 1 0 0 0 12 18 29 33
Soeclal Olvmolcs 6 42 36 17 10 0 D 0
Volunteer 5 11 7 6 24 30
Student 71 51
Other•* 6 2 20 23 20 44 51 7 13
*** Includes Personal and Unstated Reasons for travel
Demographics+ (Registered Riders, as
of Jan S)
Total November December
Seniors 47 30 36
Youth 23 13 6
Women 112 43 55
Men 63 29 35
Oxford County Services 7 4 0
Community Living/Child Services 19 11 6
Employment Ontarlo/YJC 9 2 4
Stonebridge/MSC 6 2 1
Other Community Services 17 1 7
Community Living Tillsonburg
Income Statement
For the 9 Period(s) Ending December 31, 2016
TRANSPORTATION TOWN
Unaudited
Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-18 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-18 Jan-17
Revenue:
DONATION TO T:GO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
OTHER AGENCT REV. -TOI 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,479.63 0.00 0.00 19,678.32 0.00 11,198.71 0.01
MSC JOB CONNECT REV. 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,120.00 1,629.75 0.00 0.00 1,056.69 0.00 0.01
SALES & PARENT REVENL 470.00 256.00 246.00 458.00 610.60 1,290.00 1,283.20 898.00 1,989.70 O.OI
$470.00 $256.00 $246.00 $13,057.63 $2,440.35 $4,290.00 $20,961.52 $1,954.69 $13,188.41 $0.01
General and Admln expenses:
Salaries 4,787.35 4,971.14 3,251.84 2,919.91 3,343.05 3,338.93 3,803.80 5,271.05 3,263.27 0.01
Salaries Rel!ef -Driver 0.00 1,631.08 1,590.00 1,656.25 1,961.66 2,233.03 2,125.84 3,809.38 3,464.29 0.01
Benefits Full Time 810.05 835.03 545.96 516.84 561.64 560.95 575.39 794.91 533.62 0.OI
Benefits Rellf Driver 0.00 213.61 207.88 470.20 259.62 297.38 317.44 564.23 462.97 O.Ot
Purchased Service 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.oo 0.00 o.oo 0.00 0.OI
SUPPLIES 0.00 571.67 796.75 46.00 311.82 0.00 311.82 392.27 582.41 0.0!
FOOD 0.00 0.00 30.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.rn
VEHICLE FUEUMAINT. 69.00 75.00 0.00 597.00 805.25 790.70 740.64 971.21 859.13 0.OI
ASDVERTISING 218.07 0.00 0.00 249.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.OI
$5,884.47 $8,347.53 $8,422.56 $6,455.66 $7,243.04 $7,220.99 $7,874.93 $11,803.05 $9,165.69 $0.01
Surplus (Deficit} for period ($5,414A7) ($8,091.53) ($6,176.56) $6,601.97 ($4,802.89) ($2,930.99) $13,086.59 ($9,848.36) $4,022.72 $0.01
Footer:
SUB-SCHEDULE "E.2"
COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION PILOT GRANT PROGRAM
INTERIM AND FINAL FINANCIAL STATUS REPORT
Name of Recipient (Municip Town ofTillsonburg
Report submitted by: Janelle Costantino, Manager of Finance/Deputy Treasurer
Telephone: 519-688-3009 ext 3236
Email: jcostantino@tillsonburg.ca
Date: July 05/16
Financial Statement to June 30/16
Complete the table below using information from the Budget in Schedule "B" (Budget)
Include any approved revisions and adjustments to the budget
Professional & 73,500 71,198 71,198 73,500
Equipment, Supplies 5,950 4,148 4,148 5,950
Public Outreach and 5,000 2,660 2,660 5,000
Public Outreach and 450 -450
Event-Related 1,600 827 827 1,600
Other -Accessible 13,500 10,125 10,125 13,500
Interest earned on 171
-· -·----· 100,000 88,958 88,958 171 100,000 I --
Invoices sent out Date Paid
Inv. 3395 Dec.31/16 20,199.34 Feb.4/16
Inv. 3432 Feb.29/16 9,167.78
lnv.3499 June30/16 25,098.74 July 20/16
lnv.3585 August 31/16 10,510.54 Oct.3/16
lnv.3645 Oct.31/16 11,198.71 Dec.22/16
lnv.3677 Dec.31/16 12,782.40
Total= 88,957.51
2,302 Project not yet 1,802
2,340 completed.
More expenses
· 450
773
to come at a
3,375 future date
11,042